Buying Pegasus makes you complicit with Sánchez.

The purchase of Pegasus software, and the allegations regarding who controls **Pedro Sánchez**, raise serious doubts about transparency and political strategy in Spain.

## The Shadow of Pegasus

The acquisition of **Pegasus** software has ignited a political storm in Spain, with cross-accusations about who controls the levers of power. It is suggested that buying this spying tool, capable of infiltrating mobile devices, could be an indication of complicity or, at least, a highly specific political strategy. The narrative that has emerged suggests certain political actors are using these accusations to deflect attention or benefit **Pedro Sánchez**, rather than addressing the true implications of using this technology.

## Who Pulls the Strings?

It is argued that the controversy surrounding **Pegasus** is merely an orchestrated distraction. Critical voices point out that, far from being a weakness, the alleged dependence of **Sánchez** on foreign powers like the **Mossad** or Segarro is a convenient narrative. The idea is that by portraying **Sánchez** as a puppet, they are attempting to protect him or offer him an exit, rather than confronting the reality of his management. The very existence of efficient national intelligence services is questioned, suggesting that the true influences come from agencies like the **CIA** and the **Mossad**.

## The Game of Accusations

The strategy of some political parties appears to center on spreading the idea that **Pedro Sánchez** serves external interests, such as the King of Segarro. However, it is suggested that these same parties are aware of the falsehood of such claims. The true purpose of these accusations, according to this view, is to create a smokescreen that allows **Sánchez** to remain in power. The purchase of **Pegasus**, thus, becomes another element in this complex political chessboard, where truth seems scarce and manipulation a common tool.