You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Building 1 million homes in Spain would take 3 million more workers
A viral tweet estimates that raising 1 million homes would require 3 million construction workers, who would in turn need another million homes to live in.
A calculation circulating on social media claims that building one million homes would require three million construction workers, and that housing those workers would in turn require another million homes. It is a theoretical exercise, not an official forecast.
The idea is spreading online as a way of pointing out the bottleneck that appears when housing is promised on a large scale without accounting for who will build it. The calculation is simple, and that is precisely what makes it uncomfortable: one million homes would need, according to this reasoning, three million workers. And those three million workers, if they came from abroad, would need somewhere to live.
## Where the three workers per home ratio comes from
The figure of three million workers for one million homes does not come from any official body. It is an estimate circulating online, attributed to a social media user, and it rests on an intuitive idea: every home under construction requires labour at several stages, from the structure to the finishing work.
The underlying problem is that Spain does not currently have three million workers available in construction. The sector lost a large part of its workforce after the 2008 crisis and never fully recovered it. Training new professionals is slow, and competition from other sectors, such as logistics or hospitality, is strong.
## The loop of workers who need housing themselves
The second part of the calculation is what turns the argument on its head. If those three million workers came from abroad, they would need to be housed. And housing them would require building more homes, which in turn would require more workers, who would also need somewhere to live.
It is a circular argument that is not meant to be solved, but to show that any large-scale housing plan runs into the reality of the labour market and the housing stock. It is not a prophecy; it is a way of saying that the problem is not solved with bricks alone.
## What can be taken away from this
The calculation is not a plan or a forecast. It is a way of pointing out that housing and employment go hand in hand: without workers there is no building, and without housing there are no workers. Any policy that ignores one of the two legs ends up limping.
It is worth remembering that the employment and housing figures are estimates, and that official unemployment and construction data are published by bodies such as the INE (Spain's national statistics institute) or the SEPE (the Spanish public employment service). Before making decisions based on a calculation circulating on social media, the prudent thing is to consult official sources and, if money or contracts are involved, seek advice from a professional.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (0 replies).
CEOE, Spain's main business association, argues that a general strike over housing would be "illegal" because it does not stem from a labour dispute. What Spanish strike law actually says.
Ada Colau says she is leaving the flat where she lived for 15 years because one salary wasn't enough; Newtral puts her salary as mayor at €96,000 gross
A tweet about Lula's Sephardic origins reopens the debate on genealogy and power: from Aznar to Maduro, everyone gets lumped together without verified evidence.
Vestrynge, co-founder of Podemos, points to the cost of migration for wages and reopens the left's contradiction: capital drives it, but no one limits it