Brave, Firefox and Lynx: the browser war beyond Chrome
In a world where Chrome holds 65% of the market, a wave of users prefers browsers ranging from the ultra-modern to the archaic. The choice is not trivial: it reveals priorities between privacy, performance and resistance to homogenization.
Brave: the standard of the anti-ad resistance
Brave is consolidating its position as the favorite browser thanks to its native ad blocker and forced dark mode, which turns any page into a dark interface. In practice, the experience is cleaner and faster. Those who use it defend it as the only browser that truly protects the user's attention.
Firefox, Edge and Vivaldi: the second line
Firefox is still alive, especially paired with uBlock Origin. Edge appears as a secondary option, while Vivaldi — Opera's heir — retains fans who value customization. Chrome, on the other hand, is relegated to sites that demand full compatibility.
The vintage corner: Lynx and the cult of minimalism
At the extreme are browsers like Lynx, text-only for the terminal, or Pale Moon, low on resources. Some use them in SSH sessions to handle emergencies. The discussion about Lynx — still updated, albeit minimally — sparks an almost archaeological interest: they call it "the devil's seed."
The divide is clear. Most people install whatever comes by default; this group shows that choosing a browser is still a statement of principles. And that Brave, for now, is winning the game.
Related discussions in the forum