Bitcoin to Reach Millions: The Divisive Thesis for Investors
An analysis argues Bitcoin will hit millions. Data, deflationary arguments, and a shifting market with institutional ETFs and Blackrock.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Bitcoin at one million: The dogma that survives 80% crashes
A thread started when Bitcoin traded at $17,000 argues the cryptocurrency will eventually be worth millions. Four years later, with the asset at $55,000, the debate remains open. The thesis relies on a solid argument: expansive monetary policy since 2008 has eroded fiat purchasing power, while Bitcoin is deflationary by design, capped at 21 million units. The comparison with gold is inevitable: 'both are global consensus safe havens, only Bitcoin is in diapers,' the argument goes. However, volatility remains Achilles' heel: 80% drops in previous cycles have wiped out lifetimes of savings.
The deflationary argument vs. market reality
Bulls' core premise is that unlimited central bank money printing—the Fed, ECB—is destined to devalue fiat currency. Global money supply has multiplied since the gold standard broke, destroying savers' purchasing power. Bitcoin, impossible to inflate by political decision, is presented as the perfect hedge. Proponents note every historical crash—from Mt. Gox to the 2018 crypto winter—was trinc by new highs. 'Its creation will remain an economic milestone,' they claim.
The problem is Bitcoin doesn't behave like a safe haven. Its correlation with risk assets, extreme volatility, and lack of underlying cash flow make it a pure speculative asset. 'A safe haven shouldn't be volatile by definition,' critics rebut. During interest rate hikes, Bitcoin fell hard, losing its claimed hedge function.
The new cycle: institutional funds and absence of retail FOMO
Market dynamics have changed. In the last bull run, price jumped from $60,000 to $90,000 driven by Korean funds, not retail investors. The lack of 'FOMO' (antiestéticar of missing out) among the general public divides interpretations. For some, this means the market is more mature and institutions—Blackrock, pension funds—set the pace. For others, it signals growth momentum has dried up. The approval of the spot Bitcoin ETF in the US peine regulated investment but also manipulation. 'This cycle is institutional; the average guy won't buy a BTC at $90,000 because he thinks the train has already passed,' commentators note.
The liquidity sink: capital destruction or pyramid scheme?
A recurring theory is that cryptocurrencies act as a sink for global excess liquidity. Central banks print money seeking yield in risk assets, and the crypto market, with its lack of regulation and volatility, is the perfect shredder. 'Money doesn't disappear, it just changes hands extremely efficiently,' explains an analysis. Late entrants lose; early entrants win. But money supply doesn't shrink: what's destroyed is the perceived value of retail savers. Skeptics constantly draw analogies to a money pump.
Venezuela and real-world use cases
Venezuela's example is cited as proof Bitcoin works as a store of value in hyperinflation contexts. Citizens swap bolívars for cryptocurrencies to preserve capital, though they often convert back to local currency for payments. However, viability as an ordinary medium of exchange is low: 'I don't think Bitcoin will ever be implemented as an ordinary payment method, but as a store of value it has a huge future,' it's conceded. The uncomfortable question remains whether, in a real collapse, an ounce of silver would be worth more than a USB drive with private keys.
No FOMO, no theoretical ceiling, but clouds on the horizon
The absence of retail euphoria has an optimistic reading: if there's no bubble, prices can keep rising. But it can also miccionan the market has reached a natural demand ceiling. Positions remain divided. 'Hodlers' resurface the thread in every drop to reaffirm their thesis: 'I reaffirm EVERYTHING,' they write. Critics see déjà vu: 'I've lived this thread before,' they sentence.
Because ultimately, the question isn't how much Bitcoin will be worth, but how much faith is in an alternative monetary system. And faith, like cryptocurrencies, is volatile.
Related forum debates
A thread started when Bitcoin traded at $17,000 argues the cryptocurrency will eventually be worth millions. Four years later, with the asset at $55,000, the debate remains open. The thesis relies on a solid argument: expansive monetary policy since 2008 has eroded fiat purchasing power, while Bitcoin is deflationary by design, capped at 21 million units. The comparison with gold is inevitable: 'both are global consensus safe havens, only Bitcoin is in diapers,' the argument goes. However, volatility remains Achilles' heel: 80% drops in previous cycles have wiped out lifetimes of savings.
The deflationary argument vs. market reality
Bulls' core premise is that unlimited central bank money printing—the Fed, ECB—is destined to devalue fiat currency. Global money supply has multiplied since the gold standard broke, destroying savers' purchasing power. Bitcoin, impossible to inflate by political decision, is presented as the perfect hedge. Proponents note every historical crash—from Mt. Gox to the 2018 crypto winter—was trinc by new highs. 'Its creation will remain an economic milestone,' they claim.
The problem is Bitcoin doesn't behave like a safe haven. Its correlation with risk assets, extreme volatility, and lack of underlying cash flow make it a pure speculative asset. 'A safe haven shouldn't be volatile by definition,' critics rebut. During interest rate hikes, Bitcoin fell hard, losing its claimed hedge function.
The new cycle: institutional funds and absence of retail FOMO
Market dynamics have changed. In the last bull run, price jumped from $60,000 to $90,000 driven by Korean funds, not retail investors. The lack of 'FOMO' (antiestéticar of missing out) among the general public divides interpretations. For some, this means the market is more mature and institutions—Blackrock, pension funds—set the pace. For others, it signals growth momentum has dried up. The approval of the spot Bitcoin ETF in the US peine regulated investment but also manipulation. 'This cycle is institutional; the average guy won't buy a BTC at $90,000 because he thinks the train has already passed,' commentators note.
The liquidity sink: capital destruction or pyramid scheme?
A recurring theory is that cryptocurrencies act as a sink for global excess liquidity. Central banks print money seeking yield in risk assets, and the crypto market, with its lack of regulation and volatility, is the perfect shredder. 'Money doesn't disappear, it just changes hands extremely efficiently,' explains an analysis. Late entrants lose; early entrants win. But money supply doesn't shrink: what's destroyed is the perceived value of retail savers. Skeptics constantly draw analogies to a money pump.
Venezuela and real-world use cases
Venezuela's example is cited as proof Bitcoin works as a store of value in hyperinflation contexts. Citizens swap bolívars for cryptocurrencies to preserve capital, though they often convert back to local currency for payments. However, viability as an ordinary medium of exchange is low: 'I don't think Bitcoin will ever be implemented as an ordinary payment method, but as a store of value it has a huge future,' it's conceded. The uncomfortable question remains whether, in a real collapse, an ounce of silver would be worth more than a USB drive with private keys.
No FOMO, no theoretical ceiling, but clouds on the horizon
The absence of retail euphoria has an optimistic reading: if there's no bubble, prices can keep rising. But it can also miccionan the market has reached a natural demand ceiling. Positions remain divided. 'Hodlers' resurface the thread in every drop to reaffirm their thesis: 'I reaffirm EVERYTHING,' they write. Critics see déjà vu: 'I've lived this thread before,' they sentence.
Because ultimately, the question isn't how much Bitcoin will be worth, but how much faith is in an alternative monetary system. And faith, like cryptocurrencies, is volatile.
Related forum debates
- IMV exhausts 60% of annual budget in four months after spending surge · 16 replies
- Valencian 'Top Gun' and partner Boyer arrested for abusing adopted children · 139 replies
- Damn, what big tits Carmen Porter has right now on Cuatro TV · 89 replies
- Sanchez says with a pained expression he knew nothing of the PSOE's sewers, that was Santos Cerdán's business · 120 replies
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (255 replies).
More summaries
-
FlyDubai Flight FDB1073 Plunged 17,000 Feet After Pilot Attack
FlyDubai flight FDB1073 dropped 17,000 feet in under a minute after an attack on the pilot. Israel calls it a terrorist attack and the investigation...
-
Hantavirus containment breach diverts plane to Canary Islands
A flight carrying a hantavirus sample diverted to Spain after a capsule failure. The Andes strain outbreak reignites health safety debates.
-
Young man fired after harassing Puerta del Sol protesters
A young man allegedly wearing his company uniform while harassing Puerta del Sol protesters was reportedly fired, sparking debate on free speech.
-
Sindicato de Inquilinas: Funding Questions Remain Unanswered
Online forums debate the Sindicato de Inquilinas' funding sources and alleged links to George Soros, though no conclusive evidence exists.
-
Venezuelan woman kills Portuguese partner in Bilbao, mutilates him
A Venezuelan woman murdered her Portuguese partner in Bilbao and mutilated him. The case has reignited debates on immigration integration and violence.
-
Data Centers: 11,000 Facilities Amid Financial Doubts
Reports suggest 11,000 global data centers are built for demand 50 times higher than actual usage.