Bitcoin loses 40%: between crypto faith and market reality
Bitcoin has lost 40% of its value in recent months, a plunge that has reignited the eternal debate about the nature of cryptocurrency. While supporters see it as a technical correction in a volatile asset, skeptics consider it confirmation of a bubble.
Devaluation or correction?
Opinions are polarized. On one side, some argue that Bitcoin is not being devalued; rather, it is fiat currencies that temporarily gain value. This view, drawing on heterodox monetary theory, holds that the cryptocurrency preserves its purchasing power over the long term. On the other side, critics call it a Ponzi scheme and point out that every correction draws in newcomers hoping to ride "the next wave up" without learning from previous cycles.
The mention of quantum computing adds an existential risk factor: if quantum technology were to break Bitcoin's encryption, its value could collapse to zero. Although a distant scenario, some investors keep it on their radar.
Market context and alternatives
Amid the decline, alternatives such as Pi Network, which promises mining from a mobile phone, are emerging, though its real value remains an open question. Meanwhile, traditional markets face massive money printing, which for some justifies the existence of decentralized assets.
The question that remains: if Bitcoin falls another 40%, will it still be the haven of those who distrust the traditional financial system, or will it be confirmed as the biggest digital house of cards?
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (13 replies).
Cannabis is losing its appeal: consumption is falling, oversupply is mounting and prices have hit rock bottom. The green business is deflating as users get bored and quit.
Controversy in Spain: the Socialist-run council of Mérida promoted its Christmas market with the word 'Allah' in Arabic. After criticism, the poster was withdrawn.