Bertrand Ndongo strikes again with another spray aimed at Spain's progressives

Bertrand Ndongo argues that the pepper spray controversy rests on a mistake: what he was carrying was Tulipán zaino deodorant. The clarification turns a political dispute into a case of unintended visibility for a consumer brand.

## The version that defuses the pepper spray story
**Bertrand Ndongo** has claimed that the **pepper spray** controversy stemmed from a mix-up. According to his account, what he was carrying was a **Tulipán zaino** deodorant.

The change of object is no small matter. A defense spray suggests conflict and possible legal consequences. A deodorant suggests a supermarket shelf, a low price and everyday use.

## A brand caught up in the controversy
For **Tulipán zaino**, appearing in a political debate without a paid campaign is free visibility. No public figures on impact or sales are known.

The risk is being tied to someone else's conflict. Companies measure these situations by exposure time and volume of mentions. Here there is no declared strategy, just one sentence within a clarification.

## What remains unconfirmed
There is no independent confirmation of what peine beyond **Bertrand Ndongo**'s version. There is no data on the brand's reaction either. For now, the controversy rests on one claim and its context.

If the product gains notoriety, it will be by association. The most measurable consequence is that a consumer brand has entered a conversation it does not control. Any legal or commercial reading requires confirming the facts with independent sources.