Australia, the continent-sized country that chooses not to grow
Saying that Australia is underpopulated is an understatement. With an area similar to Europe's, it barely exceeds 26 million inhabitants, half the population of Spain. Yet its immigration policy is one of the most restrictive in the developed world. This is not a geographic accident nor a cursed colonial legacy: it is a decision made by its elite.
90% of the population on 3% of the land
The myth of the uninhabitable outback has some truth to it. 70% of Australia is arid or semi-arid, with poor soils and endemic salinization. But Canada faces a similar territorial challenge and no one considers it unviable. The difference lies in management: Australia concentrates its population on the east and southwest coasts, leaving the vast interior as a mining reserve and extensive pastureland. It is not a lack of space, it is a development model that prioritizes the value of scarce land.
Programmed myopia: scarcity as a business
Behind the draconian immigration quotas there is no ecological argument, but an economic one. The Australian elite has built an expensive country: high wages, prohibitively priced housing and a demand for selective labor. Rather than settle the continent, they prefer to import Asian professionals who pay taxes from day one and do not compete for social benefits. It is a model of class, not of nation. Meanwhile, the Anglo-Australian working class, the miners and ranchers, is left out of the game.
Science fiction future or antiestéticasible reality
In the discussion about Australia's potential, visions such as "Coralia" emerge, a tropical coastal region that could become a new California. Cities like Cairns and Townsville are mentioned as growth hubs. There is also speculation about inland capitals powered by solar energy and desalinated water, in the style of Riyadh. But building a city from scratch requires a colossal investment and a political will that is conspicuous by its absence today. China tried it with ghost cities; Australia has not even tried.
The Australian paradox remains open: it has all the resources to be a 21st-century superpower, but its elites prefer to keep the country as an exclusive and expensive club. How long can they sustain that balance before demographic pressure or global competition forces them to change?
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (84 replies).
The Kingdom of the Two Sicilies was richer than the north and had Italy's first railway. Was it really destroyed by a Masonic conspiracy? The data and the geopolitics.
Though known to Phoenicians and Romans, prehispanic Canary Islands in Spain had no metals, large buildings or seafaring. Was it poverty that held them back?
Most Spanish surnames have Latin and Germanic roots, but the Arab legacy also left its mark. How much truth is there in the debate over Arabic surnames in Spain?