Alvise enters European Parliament with 3 seats, splitting right-wing vote

Alvise wins 3 seats in Europe and splits the right, while PP and PSOE vote identically 90% of the time in Brussels.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Alvise enters European Parliament with 3 seats, splitting right-wing vote
Why Alvise splits the right-wing vote without PP responding

Who lost votes to Alvise? The question hovers over the count with two uncomfortable answers. The tally shows Alvise enters the European Parliament with three seats, the PP gained ten, Vox three, and Ciudadanos lost seven. With these figures, it is worth discussing both the division and expansion of the pie.

The doubt is significant. If Alvise only cannibalized the PP and Vox, institutional right-wing faces a zero-sum game. If, however, it drew voters who never intended to vote for anyone, the board widens. The uncomfortable truth is that both readings can be true simultaneously.

Three seats and no comfortable reading

The flow drawn is mixed. Alvise collects votes from the PP, Vox, and — here lies the key — from abstention. A circulating calculation holds that, without his candidacy, turnout would have dropped from 48% to 43%. Translated: without him, demobilization would have gained ground, which was exactly what many sought to avoid.

For the PP, the data hurts. They were expected to be the great beneficiary of a conservative cycle, yet they neither double Vox nor eliminate anyone to their right. The disappearance of Ciudadanos has not helped them concentrate anything, because that space is no longer trusted: it has gone elsewhere or ceased to exist as a block.

PP and PSOE voted identically 90% of the time in Brussels

There is a fact that poisons any defense of the useful vote. The PP and PSOE voted the same nearly 90% of the time in the European Parliament over the last five years, according to the cited documentation. In Brussels, the coalition already existed: Spanish right and Spanish left rowed in the same direction almost always.

This percentage explains much of the anger. Those who voted for the PP expecting opposition find that their European adversary is their European partner. And those who voted for Alvise as punishment now have an unrefutable argument: the system functions regardless of who wins in Madrid.

What changes with the EPP and PSOE pact?

Von der Leyen announced that the European People's Party (EPP) will pact with the PSOE to build a bulwark against the far-right. The phrase, read in a Spanish context, has consequences: the vote for the PP does not alter Brussels' arithmetic. European conservatives will continue governing with socialists and greens.

Here, analysis splits. Some see this pact as a way to isolate Vox and Alvise and keep the European center intact. Others argue the opposite: that legitimizing the PSOE's framework demobilizes the right and mobilizes the left, which is exactly what has peine again.

The PP is not the right: the diagnosis Genoa does not accept

The most repeated thesis speaks not of sums, but of identity. The PP is not the right, they argue, and thus cannot claim a vote that was never its own. Its flirtation with sensible feminism, its staunch defense of the climate agenda, and its treatment of any alternative as pariahs have left it without margin on that flank.

The argument has substance. By treating Vox as a pariah, the PP legitimizes the narrative that anything outside its framework is fascism. And if it shifts slightly toward the center, it is left without its own discourse. The pincer movement is real and cannot be resolved by gaining seats in European elections.

The voter who does not return

There is a repeating pattern, according to this diagnosis: the voter who leaves does not return. The voter from Vox does not return to the PP; the PSOE voter always signs for the PSOE. There remains a core that holds on out of antiestéticar of being labeled with certain tags, but this core does not grow, while the left mobilizes election after election.

In this context, Alvise functions as a pressure valve. Its voters are described as young, angry, and fundamentally abstentionist: people who stayed home or voted as punishment in other elections. If the PSOE ended up governing, the floating question is whether this valve helps or hinders removing Sánchez.



With Alvise inside and Ciudadanos outside, with Von der Leyen pacting and the PP voting the same as the PSOE in Brussels, the doubt remains whether the right has a vote problem or a narrative problem. The data, for now, does not distinguish it from the PSOE. Someone had to say it.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (413 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back