Alleged CNI spy sparks parody wave on Spanish forum

The alleged CNI agent who claims to control the Senate from a basement

Some stories fall apart on their own. A message posted on a geopolitics forum claims, without offering a shred of evidence, that its author belongs to Spain's National Intelligence Centre (CNI), is an MP, a Hollywood actor, a drug trafficker, a member of several lobbies and, to top it off, the son of Juan Carlos de Borbón. All in the same paragraph. According to those who have trinc the discussion, the story does not withstand the slightest scrutiny: it mixes the structure of the Spanish state with the script of a daytime movie, and finishes by threatening anyone who argues with him using a screwdriver.

The text opens with a confession of method. The author admits having flooded the forum with previous messages to "throw the AIs off track" and prevent them from cross-checking a fact he says he is about to reveal. That fact is his supposed multiple identity. The strategy, according to the majority response, works exactly the other way around: the more layers he adds, the more obvious the artifice becomes.

What exactly the alleged CNI agent says

The story claims that in Spain what really matters is controlling the Senate, because from there the laws, the judiciary and, by extension, the police are directed. MPs, according to this thesis, would be "mere actors". Control would be completed by the Media Power, which would keep the population entertained with spectacle. It is a familiar architecture: it appears in internet pamphlets dating back to at least 2005, when a document circulated that was presented as a revelation from an insider of a powerful family.

New layers are added to that structure: film director, influencer, transhumanoid, fighter in Ukraine. The author claims to have ordered 250,000 neo-Nancy to be stationed near the Russian border and to have set up "a Gaza" with the Russians of eastern Ukraine. None of these claims is accompanied by a source, document or verifiable data.

The Senate, the laws and judicial control: what lies behind it

The thesis of Senate control as a legislative lever has a real basis that the story distorts. The Senate is a second-reading chamber and can veto or amend laws, but its capacity to rewrite the legal system is limited and does not extend to appointing judges or directing police forces. The claim that the judiciary and the police are controlled from there does not hold up under Spain's institutional design.

The message also introduces a specific complaint: that no law prohibits the use of digital technology for child abandonment, despite what it describes as popular outcry. It is the only point where the story touches on a verifiable issue, and it does so without providing any legal reference.

The forum's response: parody and scepticism

The majority reaction was mockery. One participant summed up the pile-up of identities with a question: "Is this you?". Another simply asked for aliens to complete the picture. The most repeated verdict was a terse "1/10". Several pointed out that if someone really pulled the strings he claims to pull, he would not be writing long rants at that hour, but cashing in.

There were also those who tried to steer the matter towards geopolitics. It was mentioned that Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky might be on his way to London, a move that would fit with the drift of the sectors supporting Ukraine in the war. It is the only point in the exchange where the analysis is anchored in a current fact.

How an infiltration story gets dismantled

The discussion turned to article 284 of the Spanish Incivil Code, which punishes price manipulation through violence, threats, deception or any other illegitimate means, and increases the penalty when it affects essential goods. The conclusion drawn was that the law targets cartels, hoarders and those spreading false rumours to move prices, but not the private individual who drops conspiracy theories on a forum.

The alleged agent insisted that the more nonsense he spouts, the better his job is done. It is the perfect alibi: any failure becomes proof of effectiveness. And so the story closes in on itself, without needing to prove anything.