Alcàsser: The Non-Existent Pentothal and the YouTubers' Circus

The Non-Existent Pentothal: How the Grand Alcàsser Documentary Deflated

The star test never aired. A content creator promised to subject Miguel Ricart to a narcoanalysis with thiopental—misnamed pentothal—and to this day, not a single frame of the supposed interrogation has surfaced. Thirty-three years after the triple murder of Alcàsser, the novelty is no longer in the La Romana pit: it's in the feud among those profiting from it.

This is the core of the sixth volume of a discussion that already totals 7,300 messages in 354 days, seven years of accumulated chronology, and an uncomfortable conclusion: the case has become an entertainment format. What was once Spain's highest-rated television program in 1993 is now a catalog of livestreams, videos, and books where each player demands their cut.

What is the Pentothal Test and Why Hasn't Anyone Seen It?

Thiopental is a controlled hospital barbiturate. It's used for anesthesia, not to elicit confessions. The idea of using it as a "truth serum" is a legend with more cinematic than scientific basis, and it's prohibited for interrogation purposes in European legislation.

With this material, a content creator—Manu Giménez, known by the nickname "El Disidente"—announced that Ricart had agreed to a test. A definitive test was promised, first mentioning five substances, then nine, and showing two pages of a supposed confidentiality agreement with a production company. In the livestream, according to analyses of the material, hard drive boxes were presented as proof of work that no one has seen.

The detail that unravels the narrative is the chronology. Almost a month before Ricart changed his version—from the abandoned factory in Catadau to the shed in Tous—a veteran crime reporter had already stated publicly that the events occurred in Tous. The "revelation" came after the script.

Why Content Creators Fight Among Themselves

The pattern repeats: initially, everyone pulls in the same direction, denouncing a state lie. When one of them starts defending the so-called official version—Antonio Anglés as the sole culprit—the group fractures. Former collaborators attack each other, accusing each other of hiding evidence and staging scripted interviews.

The most striking case involves a figure who defends the families' thesis, asserting Anglés' guilt without any doubt, and who has even offered 7,000 euros to anyone who can prove accusations against the families documentarily. The challenge, public and unanswered to date, defines the level to which the exchange has degraded.

The most frequent accusation against the new channels is plagiarism: they copy from the old conspiratorial website of Palleter, from books published in the nineties, and from the courtroom transcripts of Mississippi. And they don't verify anything. They release what gets views, not what withstands archival scrutiny.

---

A Bloodstain That Earns a Headline and Nothing More

There's a technical detail that serves as a thermometer. The existence of a "possible" bloodstain on the passenger seat of Anglés' car has been published. A stain compatible with Anglés hitting a victim in the mouth, causing bleeding, and leaving a trace on the seat back.

The nuance is everything: it's unknown if it's blood, or whose it is. The forensic version recalled suggests the girls' wounds might not have bled, even the fruta. And amidst the crossfire, Ricart claimed to remember "bloody bodies." No one agrees, and that disagreement isn't suspicion: it's noise.

Miguel Ricart has accumulated sixteen different versions of what peine. Any witness who emerges with new information—even one appearing on YouTube twenty-eight years later pointing to a nightclub security guard—carries the same flaw: a case cannot be built on the word of someone who has lied sixteen times.

Forensic Expert Frontela's Knots and the Detail No One Explains

One of the recurring analyses of the material concerns the knots used to tie the victims. Dr. Frontela stated they were not compatible with a clumsy execution or a person under the severe effects of narcotics. They were nautical knots: clove hitch, anchor bend, precision knot. Compatible profiles cited include sailors, military personnel, and healthcare workers.

Whether conclusive or not, the detail explains the persistence of the conspiratorial narrative: the official version describes two petty incivil committing a meticulous crime, and each meticulous detail reopens doubt. The sentence, however, already stated that there could have been third-party involvement, without naming them, precisely because the identified person could never be tried.

The 2025 Turn: From Conspiracy Theorist to Officialist

The evolution of the debate over these 354 days shows a clear curve. Initially, the conversation revolved around classic hoaxes: that Anglés lived on a Caribbean island funded by taxpayers, that the family had received secret funds, that the body was across the border.

As months passed, the focus shifted. A book signed by Fernando García, father of one of the victims, emerged, positioning Miriam's father as a defender of the official thesis in court. And the starting gun for a presentation tour appeared: Madrid on September 25 and 30, Valencia on October 8 and 22, Aldaia on November 11. The book's promotion coexists with the promotion of the documentary that isn't arriving.

In this transition, the star content creator ceased being the scourge of the official narrative to become its loudest defender. His former colleagues call him a traitor. His new critics, an opportunist. And his increasingly smaller audience applauds just the same.

Closing the Grand Volume and the Suspicion of Silence

A significant detail: the previous thread was closed after almost seven years, just as the conversation became uncomfortable for the content creator, and a new one was peine. Those who have trinc the case from the beginning see this as a maneuver: forcing readers to start from scratch, burying the critical accumulated material.

It could be censorship, server maintenance, or the platform being fed up. What is verifiable is the sequence: first, tags were removed, then registration was required to read, then word filtering, and finally, the closure of the main thread. Each step coincided with a sensitive moment in the narrative.

---

The result, as of today, is a case turned into a theme park. The heirs of Juan Ignacio Blanco—the journalist who fueled much of the conspiratorial theories in the nineties—now have a channel, a camera, and a sponsor. The content quality, according to veterans themselves, is inferior: more errors, less verification, same morbid fascination.

And the families, meanwhile, watch the spectacle from the sidelines. The thesis they uphold—Anglés guilty, without a doubt—has ended up being more uncomfortable for the mystery circuit than any conspiracy theory.

The documentary without pentothal increasingly resembles an election promise: announced with a date, justified with excuses, and it won't arrive. What will almost certainly arrive is the seventh volume. Because the La Romana pit no longer yields news. But it yields clicks.