A Royal Decree-Law Names a Specific Tenant, Reigniting Debate on Case-Specific Legislation

A Royal Decree-Law Naming a Specific Tenant

Within the Boletín Oficial del Estado (Spain's official gazette), the fine print of budgets, civil code reforms, and royal decree-laws (emergency legislation with force of law) that are approved in a rush all coexist. What is unusual is finding, inside one of these texts, the full name of a single individual. That is what a journalist has shared based on a screenshot of the decree: a passage that stops talking about tenants in general and refers to a specific woman by name. Her public reaction was one of shock, and rightly so. The case raises an uncomfortable question: can a royal decree-law (emergency legislation with force of law) target a specific citizen?

Is It Normal for a Law to Name a Specific Person?

The practice exists and has a technical name: case-specific laws (legislation targeting a single situation). The expropriation of Rumasa was not done by regulation, but by law, law 7/1983, which the Tribunal Constitucional (Spain's highest court on constitutional matters) upheld. There were previous individual pardons and rules granting pensions to the widows of this person or to the relatives of that person. The tradition of enacting by law what a ministry dares not sign as a regulation is old, and it does not distinguish by political tonalidad the paper on which it is printed.

There is a clear difference between a rule that sets a general framework for millions of leases and one that removes a single contract from the common framework. The first is debated for months; the second slips through the back door of urgency.

The Clash with Article 14 of the Constitution

Legally, a singular law clashes with the principle of equality before the law enshrined in Article 14. The Tribunal Constitucional (Spain's highest court on constitutional matters) has blessed it many times as long as it sees "reasonableness," a criterion flexible enough that, in practice, it will approve whatever is presented if political pressure is strong enough. The Supremo (Spain's highest ordinary court) does not lift a finger unless forced to by a question of unconstitutionality.

The Old Rent Nobody Wants to Look At

Beneath the proper name lies the core of the issue. The old rent (legacy rent control from the Franco era) stems from Franco-era legislation, and the most repeated criticism is that, if current regulations were applied to that apartment, the monthly charge would be close to 2,000 euros. The contract protected today was born under a framework that almost no one defends publicly.

Regarding whether the text lies in claiming that no adequate housing solutions were offered, the accounts contradict each other, and there is no way to settle it with what has been published. Suspending evictions or extending contracts affects thousands of households; placing a single person in the same law, by name and surname, is something else entirely.

---

In the end, the spotlight has fallen on a tenant rather than on the legal framework that allows her contract to remain valid nearly seventy years later. The staggering figure is not what she pays, but what she would pay under the law everyone considers modern: close to 2,000 euros a month. No one has yet explained why that would be fairer.