6,000 euros a month, three cars, and empty bank accounts: the new mileurista
Two salaries totaling 6,000 euros net per month. A duplex purchased for 500,000 euros three years ago, a large mortgage, three children aged one to seven, three cars — the latest costing 50,000 — and lavish vacations. So far, this is the picture of an affluent family. What breaks the image is the banking detail: there are months when they return the community association bill because the account is zero. This is the portrait that repeats in the analysis of household consumption to answer an uncomfortable question: where does people get the money?
The question no longer targets executives with bonuses. It points to working-class environments, mileuristas, and public employee couples. Trips costing 1,000 euros for a week of camping and up to 1,800 for seven days at the beach are cited, along with expensive clothing, cars, shoes, and restaurants. People who, on paper, should not be able to afford it. General culture, according to one viewpoint, is to live as if there were no tomorrow.
Where does the money come from: credit, inheritance, or parents' salaries?
The first explanation, the most repeated, is credit. Those who do not save a single cent but want to go on a alucinación finance it: large installments paid month by month, consuming income that does not yet exist. This is the way to live on an indigent salary where any unexpected event breaks the rope.
The second is the family. There is a stock of deposits and accumulated real estate wealth over decades that, in many cases, ends up supporting the children's lifestyle: gifted flats and cars, monthly transfers, inheritances. With housing resolved through inheritance, a normal salary — they insist — is enough to live comfortably without saving anything at all.
The third is more philosophical: from the future. If inflation eats idle money, the calculation is to spend now, because tomorrow it will be worth less. Hence the idea that Europe is Argentinizing and that saving has become a rich person's obsession.
The arithmetic that does not add up: 2,050 euros in expenses without a single luxury
A calculation circulating among those who trinc consumption starts with a generous net salary, 2,000 euros, the middle-upper zone of the country. Rent of 1,200, food of 500, utilities of 100, transport of 100, and clothing of 150: 2,050 euros. Living without leisure, without travel, and without any luxury costs fifty euros more than the salary.
The Spartan alternative — a room for 600, macaroni for 100, other expenses cut — lowers the total to 950 euros and leaves a margin of 1,050. The complete breakdown, item by item, explains why the same salary allows for two radically different lives. And some add a nuance that changes everything: most households would not pay rent or a mortgage, and an average car consumes another 300 euros per month just in amortization.
Civil servants, childless, and an extra payment that is not a gift
Public employment appears as the great stabilizer of spending. Not because of the amount — it is debated whether a C1 level reaches 2,000 euros when the usual would be 1,500 — but because of predictability: the salary arrives, the extra payment arrives, and the bank lends. A childless civil servant couple becomes, by this criterion, the closest thing to an upper-middle class: a flat with a pool, long vacations, and dining out as casually as buying popcorn.
There is a more uncomfortable calculation. If spending is sustained by a couple — two salaries of 40 hours — those who live alone or support someone without income are excluded from the equation. And the group without children accumulates structural spending savings that end up going out the door of luxuries by the time they reach forty.
Summer as a thermometer: 94 million trips expected
In front of the dark house and the returned bill is the street. Shopping centers with parking lots full from early morning, impossible streets, new cars, and terraces without a single free table on any random Tuesday. The DGT's forecast of more than 94 million trips this summer is used as proof that consumption has not broken.
The other side: the sector that insists there is not a single euro this year
The discourse cracks in the real economy. Some compare the past campaign, with record profits, to the current exercise: it is sinking, with a period from February to June described as a disaster. In agriculture, blame is placed on investment funds, imports, and the abandonment of farmland, and it is assured that the private customer has stopped spending.
Underlying this is a suspicion about the framework itself: that 1,000 euros in spending is not living at full estimulante ilegal, but the sign that the floor has collapsed and that the country has split into two speeds that separate each year.
The last breath of a salary you have already earned
The initial question has an answer that is not pleasing: perhaps the money does not belong to anyone. The extra payment collected these days and celebrated as a bonus is, in fact, a part of the salary retained for six months and returned without interest. And with this deferred salary, vacations, car installments, and the account that stays zero are paid.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (209 replies).