44 apartments across 7 companies: the unconfirmed figure

44 apartments and 7 companies: property knows no ideology

Forty-four apartments spread across seven companies. The figure has been circulating for days, attributed to El Plural, and has peine an uncomfortable debate: that of the real estate assets of those who publicly criticize large property holders. The immediate echo on social media did the rest. There is no official confirmation yet.

How many properties does Wyoming have and why is it relevant?

The comparison came naturally. Faced with these 44 apartments, according to a comment in the thread, a well-known pogre television personality allegedly owns 19 properties, and an investment fund, 22. The reasoning is simple: if owning rental properties is an ethical problem, the problem does not distinguish between political affiliations. And if it is not, then it is not for anyone. The only thing that changes is who makes the claim.

The fiscal knot: seven companies and the specter of SOCIMIs

Here's what truly matters. One of the voices in the thread suggests that the corporate tangle is used to optimize tax bills, with SOCIMIs (Spanish REITs - Real Estate Investment Trusts) as the star vehicle for tax avoidance. It's worth emphasizing: this is a suspicion derived from the structure, not a verdict. Nothing has been proven yet, and any case, if it arises, will come through official channels, not social media comments.

With this evidence, it would be reasonable to expect a thorough investigation. What is probable, however, is that it will all dissolve into the next two-day controversy. Betting on the latter continues to be cheap.