Cancelar el Mobile sería el canario en la mina para los mass hez. No lo van a cancelar ni en bromaAcabo de oirlo en la radio, esto va en cadena, van a tener que tomar alguna determinación
Acabo de leer sobre el tema.Un país serio, probablemente, por eso ya no pertenece a la UE, eleva hoy el nivel de alerta por ser el cobi19 “una amenaza grave e inminente para la salud pública”, mientras nuestro Gobierno sigue manteniendo vuelos directos con China, haciendo prevalecer la compra de deuda y el turismo chino, antes que la salud y el bienestar de sus compatriotas, ya lo pagarán
No me.fio... winnie poo esta en bahamas.. ese es un doble con mascra
Gracias. ¿Puedes poner link?Sobre el famoso ACE2 y teorias sobre el origen de esta "nueva gripe"
Some of my colleagues and I have a had a dig through the available real data to work out clear view of what is what.
Somethings are fairly clear.
This then creates some concern because it would have been well known that the general population is not particularly susceptible to a bichito that uses ACE2 receptors, since they are known to have low concentrations of this within lung tissue.
- That the ACE2 receptor is a risk factor for infection has been known for some time, but not too significant an issue due to its low concentrations in most populations.
- This particular bichito is a risk to those with a high concentration of ACE2 receptors in lungs and other organs.
- The consensus of papers and of prior investigation agrees that the Chinese, Japanese and some other Asian populations have a particularly high concentration of ACE2. There is no disagreement out there on this.
- There was a paper that proclaimed smoking was the prime cause of ACE2 receptor increased concentration in mainland Chinese. However this did not explain the increased levels of ACE2 receptors in the organs of Chinese.
That proposal has also now failed on epidemiological grounds, in that real life data has shown the assumptions to be wildly wrong. It also used wrong foundation data to develop the hypothesis, which would make the paper even more wildly wrong.- There is good evidence and discussion, due to the insertion of some strands, that the bichito is most likely man made.
- It would have been easily known that the bichito made is one that is sensitive to the ACE2 receptor. That is just basic knowledge in the field.
The question arises then why manufacture a bichito that is really nothing more than another bad flu to the general population.
There is suggestion then that the Chinese manufacture this bichito. But this hardly makes sense as the ACE2 risk factor to Chinese over all others was known, and its virulence to western populations, low.
Whomever created the bichito, if it were man made, would most certainly have known that its only major risk would have been to Asian populations, especially the Japanese and mainland Chinese.
If the bichito was man made, and started in Wu Han the most logical explanation is that an infected person from outside came in.
- The likelihood that this bichito was made by the Chinese is just not antiestéticasible based on the knowledge that is already held.
The main question arises, who was patient one.
We can play a guessing of who or why somebody created this bichito, in a certain knowledge that is was only really dangerous to those countries with people of high concentrations of ACE2 receptors. It is however very unlikely for China to purposely create a bichito that could only harm themselves.
- A logical explanation could be that the Chinese managed to get hold of this bichito from outside to examine it, by whomever created it. But in the process caused somebody, patient one, to be infected, who then unknowingly went into Wu Han a short trip away.
Ya mismo los está acogiendo el Viruelo.Corea del sur ha prohibido que cualquier crucero atraque en sus puertos
A los pacopositivos los bajan del barco, se dijo mil veces. Los que quedan en el barco bajan el día 19, a excepción de quienes hayan tenido "contacto directo" con los últimos positivos, a quienes les empiezan a contar de nuevo la cuarentena de 14 días.Estos van a vivir un holocausto caníbal.
Gracias, pero ponga el link.Sobre el famoso ACE2 y teorias sobre el origen de esta "nueva gripe"
Some of my colleagues and I have a had a dig through the available real data to work out clear view of what is what.
Somethings are fairly clear.
This then creates some concern because it would have been well known that the general population is not particularly susceptible to a bichito that uses ACE2 receptors, since they are known to have low concentrations of this within lung tissue.
- That the ACE2 receptor is a risk factor for infection has been known for some time, but not too significant an issue due to its low concentrations in most populations.
- This particular bichito is a risk to those with a high concentration of ACE2 receptors in lungs and other organs.
- The consensus of papers and of prior investigation agrees that the Chinese, Japanese and some other Asian populations have a particularly high concentration of ACE2. There is no disagreement out there on this.
- There was a paper that proclaimed smoking was the prime cause of ACE2 receptor increased concentration in mainland Chinese. However this did not explain the increased levels of ACE2 receptors in the organs of Chinese.
That proposal has also now failed on epidemiological grounds, in that real life data has shown the assumptions to be wildly wrong. It also used wrong foundation data to develop the hypothesis, which would make the paper even more wildly wrong.- There is good evidence and discussion, due to the insertion of some strands, that the bichito is most likely man made.
- It would have been easily known that the bichito made is one that is sensitive to the ACE2 receptor. That is just basic knowledge in the field.
The question arises then why manufacture a bichito that is really nothing more than another bad flu to the general population.
There is suggestion then that the Chinese manufacture this bichito. But this hardly makes sense as the ACE2 risk factor to Chinese over all others was known, and its virulence to western populations, low.
Whomever created the bichito, if it were man made, would most certainly have known that its only major risk would have been to Asian populations, especially the Japanese and mainland Chinese.
If the bichito was man made, and started in Wu Han the most logical explanation is that an infected person from outside came in.
- The likelihood that this bichito was made by the Chinese is just not antiestéticasible based on the knowledge that is already held.
The main question arises, who was patient one.
We can play a guessing of who or why somebody created this bichito, in a certain knowledge that is was only really dangerous to those countries with people of high concentrations of ACE2 receptors. It is however very unlikely for China to purposely create a bichito that could only harm themselves.
- A logical explanation could be that the Chinese managed to get hold of this bichito from outside to examine it, by whomever created it. But in the process caused somebody, patient one, to be infected, who then unknowingly went into Wu Han a short trip away.
De hecho sigue habiendo vuelos de Uk a China hoy.Acabo de leer sobre el tema.
Los británicos son muy legalistas ellos y han declarado el estado de serious and imminent threat, entre otras cosas, para poder detener y aislar durante 14 días a quien consideren oportuno y aunque no dé su consentimiento.
Contaminación más bichito...cóctel perfecto.Hace calol en Wuhan...