⚡⚡(HILO OFICIAL) : CRISIS DEL cobi19 ☣SARS-CoV2☣

paconan

Será en Octubre
Desde
5 Ago 2008
Mensajes
29.572
Reputación
119.378
El número de muertos por bichito supera los 900 en China, las empresas reabrieron parcialmente


El número de muertos en el nuevo brote de cobi19 superó los 900 en China continental, dijeron el lunes las autoridades de salud del país, ya que las empresas en las principales ciudades reabrieron parcialmente después de que se extendió un feriado para frenar la propagación de la infección.

La provincia central de Hubei, que ha estado en el centro de la epidemia, dijo el lunes que ha visto alrededor de 90 nuevas muertes y más de 2,600 nuevas infecciones, lo que eleva el total en todo el continente a aproximadamente 910 y más de 40,000, respectivamente.

El bichito, que puede causar neumonía o dificultades respiratorias en casos graves, ha dado de baja de la suscripción de la vita a más personas que la epidemia de cobi19 del SARS 2002-2003, que enfermó a 8.098 y se cobró la vida de 774 en todo el mundo.

Pero la tasa de mortalidad de alrededor del 2 por ciento en la última epidemia es menor que la del SARS, o síndrome respiratorio agudo severo, que registró alrededor del 10 por ciento.

En muchas partes de China el lunes, las empresas y tiendas reiniciaron sus operaciones después de las vacaciones extendidas del Año Nuevo Lunar. Pero había menos personas en las calles de Pekín y Shangai que en un día laborable normal, y muchas empresas requieren que los empleados trabajen desde casa por temor a que se infecten al entrar en contacto con otros.

En Beijing, los trenes subterráneos transportaban muchos menos pasajeros de lo habitual, y el tráfico era escaso en las principales avenidas, que normalmente estarían llenas de ciclistas y automovilistas.

Los fabricantes de automóviles japoneses y otros fabricantes que operan en China también reanudaron el trabajo, con las autoridades locales intensificando las medidas para prevenir la propagación del bichito, como controlar las temperaturas de todas las personas que usan el transporte público y rociar antisépticos.

Mientras tanto, las escuelas para estudiantes japoneses en China aún no han decidido cuándo volverán a abrir, ya que aún no está claro cuál será el ritmo del brote.

El feriado de una semana comenzó el 24 de enero, pero el gobierno chino dijo el 27 de enero que esto se extendería hasta el 2 de febrero a medida que se multiplicara el número de casos de cobi19. Muchas empresas también permanecieron cerradas la semana pasada a instancias de los gobiernos locales.

La mayoría de las muertes e infecciones se han concentrado en Hubei, particularmente en la capital, Wuhan. En Wuhan, donde se detectó el bichito por primera vez, se han construido hospitales improvisados para tratar a los infectados, con más de 10,000 trabajadores médicos contratados para enfrentar la epidemia.

El bichito ha infectado a más de 40,500 en todo el mundo, incluso en otras partes de Asia, Europa y América del Norte, con dos muertes fuera de China continental.

bichito death toll tops 900 in China as businesses partially reopen
 

Snowball

Será en Octubre
Desde
8 Sep 2007
Mensajes
24.119
Reputación
78.815
Sobre el famoso ACE2 y teorias sobre el origen de esta "nueva gripe"

Some of my colleagues and I have a had a dig through the available real data to work out clear view of what is what.

Somethings are fairly clear.

  1. That the ACE2 receptor is a risk factor for infection has been known for some time, but not too significant an issue due to its low concentrations in most populations.
  2. This particular bichito is a risk to those with a high concentration of ACE2 receptors in lungs and other organs.
  3. The consensus of papers and of prior investigation agrees that the Chinese, Japanese and some other Asian populations have a particularly high concentration of ACE2. There is no disagreement out there on this.
  4. There was a paper that proclaimed smoking was the prime cause of ACE2 receptor increased concentration in mainland Chinese. However this did not explain the increased levels of ACE2 receptors in the organs of Chinese.
    That proposal has also now failed on epidemiological grounds, in that real life data has shown the assumptions to be wildly wrong. It also used wrong foundation data to develop the hypothesis, which would make the paper even more wildly wrong.
  5. There is good evidence and discussion, due to the insertion of some strands, that the bichito is most likely man made.
  6. It would have been easily known that the bichito made is one that is sensitive to the ACE2 receptor. That is just basic knowledge in the field.
This then creates some concern because it would have been well known that the general population is not particularly susceptible to a bichito that uses ACE2 receptors, since they are known to have low concentrations of this within lung tissue.

The question arises then why manufacture a bichito that is really nothing more than another bad flu to the general population.

There is suggestion then that the Chinese manufacture this bichito. But this hardly makes sense as the ACE2 risk factor to Chinese over all others was known, and its virulence to western populations, low.

Whomever created the bichito, if it were man made, would most certainly have known that its only major risk would have been to Asian populations, especially the Japanese and mainland Chinese.

  • The likelihood that this bichito was made by the Chinese is just not antiestéticasible based on the knowledge that is already held.
If the bichito was man made, and started in Wu Han the most logical explanation is that an infected person from outside came in.

The main question arises, who was patient one.

  • A logical explanation could be that the Chinese managed to get hold of this bichito from outside to examine it, by whomever created it. But in the process caused somebody, patient one, to be infected, who then unknowingly went into Wu Han a short trip away.
We can play a guessing of who or why somebody created this bichito, in a certain knowledge that is was only really dangerous to those countries with people of high concentrations of ACE2 receptors. It is however very unlikely for China to purposely create a bichito that could only harm themselves.
 

Scardanelli

Hala Madrid
Desde
24 Abr 2009
Mensajes
48.917
Reputación
112.391
Lugar
85 Albert Embankment
Un país serio, probablemente, por eso ya no pertenece a la UE, eleva hoy el nivel de alerta por ser el cobi19 “una amenaza grave e inminente para la salud pública”, mientras nuestro Gobierno sigue manteniendo vuelos directos con China, haciendo prevalecer la compra de deuda y el turismo chino, antes que la salud y el bienestar de sus compatriotas, ya lo pagarán
Acabo de leer sobre el tema.

Los británicos son muy legalistas ellos y han declarado el estado de serious and imminent threat, entre otras cosas, para poder detener y aislar durante 14 días a quien consideren oportuno y aunque no dé su consentimiento.
 

Scardanelli

Hala Madrid
Desde
24 Abr 2009
Mensajes
48.917
Reputación
112.391
Lugar
85 Albert Embankment
Sobre el famoso ACE2 y teorias sobre el origen de esta "nueva gripe"

Some of my colleagues and I have a had a dig through the available real data to work out clear view of what is what.

Somethings are fairly clear.


  1. That the ACE2 receptor is a risk factor for infection has been known for some time, but not too significant an issue due to its low concentrations in most populations.
  2. This particular bichito is a risk to those with a high concentration of ACE2 receptors in lungs and other organs.
  3. The consensus of papers and of prior investigation agrees that the Chinese, Japanese and some other Asian populations have a particularly high concentration of ACE2. There is no disagreement out there on this.
  4. There was a paper that proclaimed smoking was the prime cause of ACE2 receptor increased concentration in mainland Chinese. However this did not explain the increased levels of ACE2 receptors in the organs of Chinese.
    That proposal has also now failed on epidemiological grounds, in that real life data has shown the assumptions to be wildly wrong. It also used wrong foundation data to develop the hypothesis, which would make the paper even more wildly wrong.
  5. There is good evidence and discussion, due to the insertion of some strands, that the bichito is most likely man made.
  6. It would have been easily known that the bichito made is one that is sensitive to the ACE2 receptor. That is just basic knowledge in the field.
This then creates some concern because it would have been well known that the general population is not particularly susceptible to a bichito that uses ACE2 receptors, since they are known to have low concentrations of this within lung tissue.

The question arises then why manufacture a bichito that is really nothing more than another bad flu to the general population.

There is suggestion then that the Chinese manufacture this bichito. But this hardly makes sense as the ACE2 risk factor to Chinese over all others was known, and its virulence to western populations, low.

Whomever created the bichito, if it were man made, would most certainly have known that its only major risk would have been to Asian populations, especially the Japanese and mainland Chinese.


  • The likelihood that this bichito was made by the Chinese is just not antiestéticasible based on the knowledge that is already held.
If the bichito was man made, and started in Wu Han the most logical explanation is that an infected person from outside came in.

The main question arises, who was patient one.


  • A logical explanation could be that the Chinese managed to get hold of this bichito from outside to examine it, by whomever created it. But in the process caused somebody, patient one, to be infected, who then unknowingly went into Wu Han a short trip away.
We can play a guessing of who or why somebody created this bichito, in a certain knowledge that is was only really dangerous to those countries with people of high concentrations of ACE2 receptors. It is however very unlikely for China to purposely create a bichito that could only harm themselves.
Gracias. ¿Puedes poner link?
 

ÁcrataMagallania

Madmaxista
Desde
10 Jul 2014
Mensajes
18.261
Reputación
86.909
Estos van a vivir un holocausto caníbal.
A los pacopositivos los bajan del barco, se dijo mil veces. Los que quedan en el barco bajan el día 19, a excepción de quienes hayan tenido "contacto directo" con los últimos positivos, a quienes les empiezan a contar de nuevo la cuarentena de 14 días.
 

ZHU DE

PLA Unit 61398
Desde
7 Nov 2009
Mensajes
77.991
Reputación
206.300
Lugar
Tonggang Road, Pudong, Shanghai
Sobre el famoso ACE2 y teorias sobre el origen de esta "nueva gripe"

Some of my colleagues and I have a had a dig through the available real data to work out clear view of what is what.

Somethings are fairly clear.


  1. That the ACE2 receptor is a risk factor for infection has been known for some time, but not too significant an issue due to its low concentrations in most populations.
  2. This particular bichito is a risk to those with a high concentration of ACE2 receptors in lungs and other organs.
  3. The consensus of papers and of prior investigation agrees that the Chinese, Japanese and some other Asian populations have a particularly high concentration of ACE2. There is no disagreement out there on this.
  4. There was a paper that proclaimed smoking was the prime cause of ACE2 receptor increased concentration in mainland Chinese. However this did not explain the increased levels of ACE2 receptors in the organs of Chinese.
    That proposal has also now failed on epidemiological grounds, in that real life data has shown the assumptions to be wildly wrong. It also used wrong foundation data to develop the hypothesis, which would make the paper even more wildly wrong.
  5. There is good evidence and discussion, due to the insertion of some strands, that the bichito is most likely man made.
  6. It would have been easily known that the bichito made is one that is sensitive to the ACE2 receptor. That is just basic knowledge in the field.
This then creates some concern because it would have been well known that the general population is not particularly susceptible to a bichito that uses ACE2 receptors, since they are known to have low concentrations of this within lung tissue.

The question arises then why manufacture a bichito that is really nothing more than another bad flu to the general population.

There is suggestion then that the Chinese manufacture this bichito. But this hardly makes sense as the ACE2 risk factor to Chinese over all others was known, and its virulence to western populations, low.

Whomever created the bichito, if it were man made, would most certainly have known that its only major risk would have been to Asian populations, especially the Japanese and mainland Chinese.


  • The likelihood that this bichito was made by the Chinese is just not antiestéticasible based on the knowledge that is already held.
If the bichito was man made, and started in Wu Han the most logical explanation is that an infected person from outside came in.

The main question arises, who was patient one.


  • A logical explanation could be that the Chinese managed to get hold of this bichito from outside to examine it, by whomever created it. But in the process caused somebody, patient one, to be infected, who then unknowingly went into Wu Han a short trip away.
We can play a guessing of who or why somebody created this bichito, in a certain knowledge that is was only really dangerous to those countries with people of high concentrations of ACE2 receptors. It is however very unlikely for China to purposely create a bichito that could only harm themselves.
Gracias, pero ponga el link.
 

frangelico

Madmaxista
Desde
26 Nov 2014
Mensajes
39.627
Reputación
121.788
Acabo de leer sobre el tema.

Los británicos son muy legalistas ellos y han declarado el estado de serious and imminent threat, entre otras cosas, para poder detener y aislar durante 14 días a quien consideren oportuno y aunque no dé su consentimiento.
De hecho sigue habiendo vuelos de Uk a China hoy.
 

alnitak

Madmaxista
Desde
19 Sep 2009
Mensajes
13.106
Reputación
34.632
Lugar
RIGA
En los.foros chinos hay cambio de tendencia

Estan desapreciendo los criticos con el partido comunista, que suelen escribir desde fuera de china, y se leen peticiones de destruccion de USA..si donald tiene el antidoto deberia soltarlo ya