Todo esto atufa...

  • Autor del tema To lo negro...
  • Fecha de inicio
T

To lo negro...

Guest
¡¡Que no es que atufe!!, que está escrito en inglés...
;-)
PD:Al menos, podrías poner una traducción del texto, que esto es
es.charla... y no tod@s sabemos o tenemos, que aprender inglés.

"eric" <mleh@tinet.fut.es> escribió en el mensaje
news:42D7F0E8.4030508@tinet.fut.es...
> London Stagecoach Employee Says Bus Bombing Suspicious
>
> Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet | July 15 2005
>
> We received an e mail from an employee of Stagecoach, the company
> responsible for the majority of London buses.
>
> Our contact works a route roughly one mile from the site of the bus
> bombing last Thursday.
>
> The bus driver pointed out that the number 30 bus was the only one to be
> re-routed after the initial bombs went off in the London Underground,
> every other bus carried on its normal journey, but for some reason this
> bus was diverted.
>
> The driver notes the amowing about CCTV maintainence.
>
> "CCTV gets maintained at least 2 or 3 times a week and can digitally store
> upto 2 whole weeks worth of footage. this is done by a private
> contractor....So when I heard that the CCTV wasn't working on a vehicle
> that's no more than 2 years old since last June.....I'm sorry that's
> rubbish, I work for the company I know different."
>
> Also a point of interest....last saturday a contractor came to inspect the
> CCTV on the buses at the depot, According to my supervisor the person
> spent more than 20 hours over that weekend, 20 hours to see if the CCTV is
> working? Also that person who came was not a regular contractor, for
> security reasons the same few people always come to the depot to carry out
> work, this time it was different.
>
> Drivers in the depot already think the so called bombers had inside help
> because it was to organised. Some even think it had help from the
> company."
>
> I have received other information suggesting that the CCTV is regularly
> maintained and checked. The police pay the bus company to check it, and
> the bus company makes a substantial profit out of this, so all parties
> benefit from keeping the CCTV systems working.
>
> This information makes it all the more suspicious that the bus cameras
> were not working.
>
> Was the mammoth 20 hour inspection session of the CCTV a means of
> disabling the CCTV, or something even darker? Were the contractors, who
> were not familiar to the bus company employees, actually placing the bomb?
>
> But don't worry, the media are drooling over this picture of supposed
> suicide bomber Hasib Hussain, who we are told detonated the bus bomb.
>
> Well, it's a grainy picture of a Muslim guy with a rucksack, case closed!
> That's good enough evidence for me, I'm going back to sleep.
>
> It's beyond doubt that these four Jovenlandeses were framed. They were most
> likely hired as MI6 spies, sent to Pakistan and then brought back and told
> they were to take part in an important exercise to test national security.
> Give them the rucksacks, get them on the trains and then detonate the
> bombs remotely.
>
> Do you really believe for a second that guys with 8 month babies and guys
> who taught diasbled schoolchildren would want to blow themselves up and
> kill other innocent people?
>
 
E

eric

Guest
London Stagecoach Employee Says Bus Bombing Suspicious

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet | July 15 2005

We received an e mail from an employee of Stagecoach, the company
responsible for the majority of London buses.

Our contact works a route roughly one mile from the site of the bus
bombing last Thursday.

The bus driver pointed out that the number 30 bus was the only one to be
re-routed after the initial bombs went off in the London Underground,
every other bus carried on its normal journey, but for some reason this
bus was diverted.

The driver notes the amowing about CCTV maintainence.

"CCTV gets maintained at least 2 or 3 times a week and can digitally
store upto 2 whole weeks worth of footage. this is done by a private
contractor....So when I heard that the CCTV wasn't working on a vehicle
that's no more than 2 years old since last June.....I'm sorry that's
rubbish, I work for the company I know different."

Also a point of interest....last saturday a contractor came to inspect
the CCTV on the buses at the depot, According to my supervisor the
person spent more than 20 hours over that weekend, 20 hours to see if
the CCTV is working? Also that person who came was not a regular
contractor, for security reasons the same few people always come to the
depot to carry out work, this time it was different.

Drivers in the depot already think the so called bombers had inside help
because it was to organised. Some even think it had help from the company."

I have received other information suggesting that the CCTV is regularly
maintained and checked. The police pay the bus company to check it, and
the bus company makes a substantial profit out of this, so all parties
benefit from keeping the CCTV systems working.

This information makes it all the more suspicious that the bus cameras
were not working.

Was the mammoth 20 hour inspection session of the CCTV a means of
disabling the CCTV, or something even darker? Were the contractors, who
were not familiar to the bus company employees, actually placing the bomb?

But don't worry, the media are drooling over this picture of supposed
suicide bomber Hasib Hussain, who we are told detonated the bus bomb.

Well, it's a grainy picture of a Muslim guy with a rucksack, case
closed! That's good enough evidence for me, I'm going back to sleep.

It's beyond doubt that these four Jovenlandeses were framed. They were most
likely hired as MI6 spies, sent to Pakistan and then brought back and
told they were to take part in an important exercise to test national
security. Give them the rucksacks, get them on the trains and then
detonate the bombs remotely.

Do you really believe for a second that guys with 8 month babies and
guys who taught diasbled schoolchildren would want to blow themselves up
and kill other innocent people?
 
A

Altair

Guest
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 19:22:48 +0200, eric <mleh@tinet.fut.es> wrote:

>London Stagecoach Employee Says Bus Bombing Suspicious
>
>Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet | July 15 2005
>
>We received an e mail from an employee of Stagecoach, the company
>responsible for the majority of London buses.
>
>Our contact works a route roughly one mile from the site of the bus
>bombing last Thursday.
>
>The bus driver pointed out that the number 30 bus was the only one to be
>re-routed after the initial bombs went off in the London Underground,
>every other bus carried on its normal journey, but for some reason this
>bus was diverted.
>
>The driver notes the amowing about CCTV maintainence.
>
>"CCTV gets maintained at least 2 or 3 times a week and can digitally
>store upto 2 whole weeks worth of footage. this is done by a private
>contractor....So when I heard that the CCTV wasn't working on a vehicle
>that's no more than 2 years old since last June.....I'm sorry that's
>rubbish, I work for the company I know different."
>
>Also a point of interest....last saturday a contractor came to inspect
>the CCTV on the buses at the depot, According to my supervisor the
>person spent more than 20 hours over that weekend, 20 hours to see if
>the CCTV is working? Also that person who came was not a regular
>contractor, for security reasons the same few people always come to the
>depot to carry out work, this time it was different.
>
>Drivers in the depot already think the so called bombers had inside help
>because it was to organised. Some even think it had help from the company."
>
>I have received other information suggesting that the CCTV is regularly
>maintained and checked. The police pay the bus company to check it, and
>the bus company makes a substantial profit out of this, so all parties
>benefit from keeping the CCTV systems working.
>
>This information makes it all the more suspicious that the bus cameras
>were not working.
>
>Was the mammoth 20 hour inspection session of the CCTV a means of
>disabling the CCTV, or something even darker? Were the contractors, who
>were not familiar to the bus company employees, actually placing the bomb?
>
>But don't worry, the media are drooling over this picture of supposed
>suicide bomber Hasib Hussain, who we are told detonated the bus bomb.
>
>Well, it's a grainy picture of a Muslim guy with a rucksack, case
>closed! That's good enough evidence for me, I'm going back to sleep.
>
>It's beyond doubt that these four Jovenlandeses were framed. They were most
>likely hired as MI6 spies, sent to Pakistan and then brought back and
>told they were to take part in an important exercise to test national
>security. Give them the rucksacks, get them on the trains and then
>detonate the bombs remotely.
>
>Do you really believe for a second that guys with 8 month babies and
>guys who taught diasbled schoolchildren would want to blow themselves up
>and kill other innocent people?



¡Gibraltar español!

8-DDDDDD
 
S

Shevek

Guest
To lo oscuro... escribió:

Otra muestra (y la de Altair otra más) de la cultura general de la
derecha española.

> ¡¡Que no es que atufe!!, que está escrito en inglés...
> ;-)
> PD:Al menos, podrías poner una traducción del texto, que esto es
> es.charla... y no tod@s sabemos o tenemos, que aprender inglés.



>
> "eric" <mleh@tinet.fut.es> escribió en el mensaje
> news:42D7F0E8.4030508@tinet.fut.es...
>
>>London Stagecoach Employee Says Bus Bombing Suspicious
>>


Empleado de 'London Stagecoach' afirma que la bomba del autobús es
sospechosa.

>>Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet | July 15 2005
>>
>>We received an e mail from an employee of Stagecoach, the company
>>responsible for the majority of London buses.


Hemos recibido un e-mail de un empleado de Stagecoach, la compañía
responsable de la mayoría de los autobuses de Londres.

>>Our contact works a route roughly one mile from the site of the bus
>>bombing last Thursday.


Nuestro contacto trabaja en una ruta más o menos a kilómetro y medio del
autobús volado el pasado jueves.

>>The bus driver pointed out that the number 30 bus was the only one to be
>>re-routed after the initial bombs went off in the London Underground,
>>every other bus carried on its normal journey, but for some reason this
>>bus was diverted.


El conductor de autobús señaló que el autobús número 30 fue el único
desviado después de las explosiones iniciales del Metro de Londres.
Todos los demás autobuses siguieron con su ruta normal, pero por alguna
razón este autobús fue desviado.

>>The driver notes the amowing about CCTV maintainence.
>>


El conductor señala lo siguiente acerca del mantenimiento de las cámaras
de vídeo de vigilancia.

>>"CCTV gets maintained at least 2 or 3 times a week and can digitally store
>>upto 2 whole weeks worth of footage. this is done by a private
>>contractor....So when I heard that the CCTV wasn't working on a vehicle
>>that's no more than 2 years old since last June.....I'm sorry that's
>>rubbish, I work for the company I know different."
>>


"La cámaras de vídeo son revisadas dos o tres veces por semana y pueden
almacenar digitalmente hasta dos semanas completas de grabación. De esto
se ocupa una contrata privada... Así que cuando me enteré que las
cámaras no funcionaban desde junio, en un autobús que no tiene más de 2
años... Lo siento pero esto es mentira. Trabajo para la compañía y sé
que la cosa no va así."

>>Also a point of interest....last saturday a contractor came to inspect the
>>CCTV on the buses at the depot, According to my supervisor the person
>>spent more than 20 hours over that weekend, 20 hours to see if the CCTV is
>>working? Also that person who came was not a regular contractor, for
>>security reasons the same few people always come to the depot to carry out
>>work, this time it was different.
>>


Otro detalle de interés... El pasado sábado un contratista vino a
inspeccionar las cámaras de los autobuses del depósito. Según mis
supervisores, el individuo empleo más de 20 horas en el fin de semana.
¿20 horas para ver si las cámaras funcionan? Además, esta persona no era
un contratista habitual. Por razones de seguridad, son siempre las
mismas pocas personas las que vienen a trabajar al depósito. Esta vez
fue diferente.

>>Drivers in the depot already think the so called bombers had inside help
>>because it was to organised. Some even think it had help from the
>>company."


Los conductores del depósito ya piensan que los así llamados terroristas
tenían ayuda de dentro, porque estaba demasiado organizado. Algunos
incluso piensan que tenían ayuda de la compañía".

>>
>>I have received other information suggesting that the CCTV is regularly
>>maintained and checked. The police pay the bus company to check it, and
>>the bus company makes a substantial profit out of this, so all parties
>>benefit from keeping the CCTV systems working.


He recibido información adicional que sugiere que las cámaras son
recisadas y reparadas regularmente. La policía paga a la compañía de
autobuses para comprobarlas, y la compañía obtiene unsustancioso
beneficio de esto, así que todas las partes de benefician de que las
cámaras funcionen.
>>
>>This information makes it all the more suspicious that the bus cameras
>>were not working.


Esta información hace aun más sospechoso el que las cámaras del autobus
no funcionaran.

>>
>>Was the mammoth 20 hour inspection session of the CCTV a means of
>>disabling the CCTV, or something even darker? Were the contractors, who
>>were not familiar to the bus company employees, actually placing the bomb?
>>


¿Fue la mastodóntica sesión de inspección de 20 horas de las cámaras una
manera de desactivarlas, o algo incluso más oscuro? ¿Estaban en realidad
colocando la bomba los contratistas, que no eran familiares a los
empleados de la compañia de autobuses?

>>But don't worry, the media are drooling over this picture of supposed
>>suicide bomber Hasib Hussain, who we are told detonated the bus bomb.
>>


Pero no os preocupéis, los medios estan babeando sobre esta fotografía
del supuesto terrorista suicida Hasib Hussain, del que se nos ha dicho
que detonó la bomba del autobús.

>>Well, it's a grainy picture of a Muslim guy with a rucksack, case closed!
>>That's good enough evidence for me, I'm going back to sleep.
>>


Bueno, es una foto granulosa de un tío fiel a la religión del amor con una mochila, asunto
zanjado. Eso es prueba suficiente para mí, me voy a dormir.

>>It's beyond doubt that these four Jovenlandeses were framed. They were most
>>likely hired as MI6 spies, sent to Pakistan and then brought back and told
>>they were to take part in an important exercise to test national security.
>>Give them the rucksacks, get them on the trains and then detonate the
>>bombs remotely.


Está más allá de la duda que estos cuatro fieles a la religión del amor fueron cazados en
una trampa. Probablemente fueron contratados como espías por el MI6,
enviados a Pakistán y luego traídos de vuelta y se les dijo que iban a
tomar parte en un importante ejercicico para comprobar la seguridad
nacional. Se les dan las mochilas, se les mete rn los trenes y luego se
detonan las bombas por control remoto.

>>
>>Do you really believe for a second that guys with 8 month babies and guys
>>who taught diasbled schoolchildren would want to blow themselves up and
>>kill other innocent people?


¿Os creeis por un momento que estos tíos, con bebés de ocho meses, y
tíos que enseñaban a escolares discpacitados, iban a querer volarse a sí
mismos y dar de baja de la suscripción de la vida a gente inocente?

--
Shevek

(Quitar pi para responder por e-mail)
 
T

To lo negro...

Guest
Coñe, eres demasiado serio para estar por aquí y que no te de una úlcera...
Tómate algunas cosas a coña, es un consejo...

"Shevek" <shevek31405@terra.es> escribió en el mensaje
news:3jqjnfFrh0ebU1@individual.net...
> To lo oscuro... escribió:
>
> Otra muestra (y la de Altair otra más) de la cultura general de la derecha
> española.
>
>> ¡¡Que no es que atufe!!, que está escrito en inglés...
>> ;-)
>> PD:Al menos, podrías poner una traducción del texto, que esto es
>> es.charla... y no tod@s sabemos o tenemos, que aprender inglés.

>
>
>>
>> "eric" <mleh@tinet.fut.es> escribió en el mensaje
>> news:42D7F0E8.4030508@tinet.fut.es...
>>
>>>London Stagecoach Employee Says Bus Bombing Suspicious
>>>

>
> Empleado de 'London Stagecoach' afirma que la bomba del autobús es
> sospechosa.
>
>>>Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet | July 15 2005
>>>
>>>We received an e mail from an employee of Stagecoach, the company
>>>responsible for the majority of London buses.

>
> Hemos recibido un e-mail de un empleado de Stagecoach, la compañía
> responsable de la mayoría de los autobuses de Londres.
>
>>>Our contact works a route roughly one mile from the site of the bus
>>>bombing last Thursday.

>
> Nuestro contacto trabaja en una ruta más o menos a kilómetro y medio del
> autobús volado el pasado jueves.
>
>>>The bus driver pointed out that the number 30 bus was the only one to be
>>>re-routed after the initial bombs went off in the London Underground,
>>>every other bus carried on its normal journey, but for some reason this
>>>bus was diverted.

>
> El conductor de autobús señaló que el autobús número 30 fue el único
> desviado después de las explosiones iniciales del Metro de Londres. Todos
> los demás autobuses siguieron con su ruta normal, pero por alguna razón
> este autobús fue desviado.
>
>>>The driver notes the amowing about CCTV maintainence.
>>>

>
> El conductor señala lo siguiente acerca del mantenimiento de las cámaras
> de vídeo de vigilancia.
>
>>>"CCTV gets maintained at least 2 or 3 times a week and can digitally
>>>store upto 2 whole weeks worth of footage. this is done by a private
>>>contractor....So when I heard that the CCTV wasn't working on a vehicle
>>>that's no more than 2 years old since last June.....I'm sorry that's
>>>rubbish, I work for the company I know different."
>>>

>
> "La cámaras de vídeo son revisadas dos o tres veces por semana y pueden
> almacenar digitalmente hasta dos semanas completas de grabación. De esto
> se ocupa una contrata privada... Así que cuando me enteré que las cámaras
> no funcionaban desde junio, en un autobús que no tiene más de 2 años... Lo
> siento pero esto es mentira. Trabajo para la compañía y sé que la cosa no
> va así."
>
>>>Also a point of interest....last saturday a contractor came to inspect
>>>the CCTV on the buses at the depot, According to my supervisor the person
>>>spent more than 20 hours over that weekend, 20 hours to see if the CCTV
>>>is working? Also that person who came was not a regular contractor, for
>>>security reasons the same few people always come to the depot to carry
>>>out work, this time it was different.
>>>

>
> Otro detalle de interés... El pasado sábado un contratista vino a
> inspeccionar las cámaras de los autobuses del depósito. Según mis
> supervisores, el individuo empleo más de 20 horas en el fin de semana. ¿20
> horas para ver si las cámaras funcionan? Además, esta persona no era un
> contratista habitual. Por razones de seguridad, son siempre las mismas
> pocas personas las que vienen a trabajar al depósito. Esta vez fue
> diferente.
>
>>>Drivers in the depot already think the so called bombers had inside help
>>>because it was to organised. Some even think it had help from the
>>>company."

>
> Los conductores del depósito ya piensan que los así llamados terroristas
> tenían ayuda de dentro, porque estaba demasiado organizado. Algunos
> incluso piensan que tenían ayuda de la compañía".
>
>>>
>>>I have received other information suggesting that the CCTV is regularly
>>>maintained and checked. The police pay the bus company to check it, and
>>>the bus company makes a substantial profit out of this, so all parties
>>>benefit from keeping the CCTV systems working.

>
> He recibido información adicional que sugiere que las cámaras son
> recisadas y reparadas regularmente. La policía paga a la compañía de
> autobuses para comprobarlas, y la compañía obtiene unsustancioso beneficio
> de esto, así que todas las partes de benefician de que las cámaras
> funcionen.
>>>
>>>This information makes it all the more suspicious that the bus cameras
>>>were not working.

>
> Esta información hace aun más sospechoso el que las cámaras del autobus no
> funcionaran.
>
>>>
>>>Was the mammoth 20 hour inspection session of the CCTV a means of
>>>disabling the CCTV, or something even darker? Were the contractors, who
>>>were not familiar to the bus company employees, actually placing the
>>>bomb?
>>>

>
> ¿Fue la mastodóntica sesión de inspección de 20 horas de las cámaras una
> manera de desactivarlas, o algo incluso más oscuro? ¿Estaban en realidad
> colocando la bomba los contratistas, que no eran familiares a los
> empleados de la compañia de autobuses?
>
>>>But don't worry, the media are drooling over this picture of supposed
>>>suicide bomber Hasib Hussain, who we are told detonated the bus bomb.
>>>

>
> Pero no os preocupéis, los medios estan babeando sobre esta fotografía del
> supuesto terrorista suicida Hasib Hussain, del que se nos ha dicho que
> detonó la bomba del autobús.
>
>>>Well, it's a grainy picture of a Muslim guy with a rucksack, case closed!
>>>That's good enough evidence for me, I'm going back to sleep.
>>>

>
> Bueno, es una foto granulosa de un tío fiel a la religión del amor con una mochila, asunto
> zanjado. Eso es prueba suficiente para mí, me voy a dormir.
>
>>>It's beyond doubt that these four Jovenlandeses were framed. They were most
>>>likely hired as MI6 spies, sent to Pakistan and then brought back and
>>>told they were to take part in an important exercise to test national
>>>security. Give them the rucksacks, get them on the trains and then
>>>detonate the bombs remotely.

>
> Está más allá de la duda que estos cuatro fieles a la religión del amor fueron cazados en una
> trampa. Probablemente fueron contratados como espías por el MI6, enviados
> a Pakistán y luego traídos de vuelta y se les dijo que iban a tomar parte
> en un importante ejercicico para comprobar la seguridad nacional. Se les
> dan las mochilas, se les mete rn los trenes y luego se detonan las bombas
> por control remoto.
>
>>>
>>>Do you really believe for a second that guys with 8 month babies and guys
>>>who taught diasbled schoolchildren would want to blow themselves up and
>>>kill other innocent people?

>
> ¿Os creeis por un momento que estos tíos, con bebés de ocho meses, y tíos
> que enseñaban a escolares discpacitados, iban a querer volarse a sí mismos
> y dar de baja de la suscripción de la vida a gente inocente?
>
> --
> Shevek
>
> (Quitar pi para responder por e-mail)
 
M

manitou

Guest

>>> It's beyond doubt that these four Jovenlandeses were framed. They were
>>> most likely hired as MI6 spies, sent to Pakistan and then brought
>>> back and told they were to take part in an important exercise to
>>> test national security. Give them the rucksacks, get them on the
>>> trains and then detonate the bombs remotely.

>
> Está más allá de la duda que estos cuatro fieles a la religión del amor fueron cazados en
> una trampa. Probablemente fueron contratados como espías por el MI6,
> enviados a Pakistán y luego traídos de vuelta y se les dijo que iban a
> tomar parte en un importante ejercicico para comprobar la seguridad
> nacional. Se les dan las mochilas, se les mete rn los trenes y luego
> se detonan las bombas por control remoto.


Sólo hay un fallo, en el Metro no funciona el control remoto, aunque si
podrían funcionar con detonadores, pero no es el caso.

>>> Do you really believe for a second that guys with 8 month babies
>>> and guys who taught diasbled schoolchildren would want to blow
>>> themselves up and kill other innocent people?

>
> ¿Os creeis por un momento que estos tíos, con bebés de ocho meses, y
> tíos que enseñaban a escolares discpacitados, iban a querer volarse a
> sí mismos y dar de baja de la suscripción de la vida a gente inocente?


Yo si me lo creo, es mas, puede que abra un hilo al respecto. Esta gente son
fanáticos religiosos, creen que luchan en una guerra y están dispuestos a
morir para (según creen) defender a los suyos. Te suena?? Tu estarías
dispuesto??

Es el mismo comportamiento que los miembros de una secta peligrosa. Así
pues, sería necesario investigar todo lo que rodea el Islam y aquellos
sitios en los que se viera que hay un comportamiento de tipo sectario,
aplicar la ley correspondiente a sectas peligrosas. Así se conseguiría
atajar el problema. Lo difícil es meter mano en éste asunto sin que se monte
una subida de peso entre la comunidad musulmana mundial.

Saludos.
 
X

Xanatos

Guest
"manitou" <a.serrano.m_NOSPAM_@terra.es> escribió en el mensaje
news:db9fa4$lnh$1@nsnmpen2-gest.nuria.telefonica-data.net...
>> ¿Os creeis por un momento que estos tíos, con bebés de ocho meses, y
>> tíos que enseñaban a escolares discpacitados, iban a querer volarse a
>> sí mismos y dar de baja de la suscripción de la vida a gente inocente?

>
> Yo si me lo creo, es mas, puede que abra un hilo al respecto. Esta gente
> son fanáticos religiosos, creen que luchan en una guerra y están
> dispuestos a morir para (según creen) defender a los suyos. Te suena?? Tu
> estarías dispuesto??
>
> Es el mismo comportamiento que los miembros de una secta peligrosa.


Has puesto el dedo en la llaga, el mecanismo es como el de una secta.

Xanatos

> Saludos.
>
>
 
P

Pedro Cubino Neila

Guest
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 19:22:48 +0200, eric <mleh@tinet.fut.es> wrote:

>London Stagecoach Employee Says Bus Bombing Suspicious
>
>Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet | July 15 2005


¡Ya lo creo que atufa! No he querido enterarme excesivamente de cómo
van las investigaciones policiales en UK sobre lo del 7-J, pero a la
vista de lo que explica ese e-mail, sí voy a poner algo más de interés
en leer la prensa británica.


Pedro Cubino Neila
Amigo de mis amigos/My friends's friend
pedro@cubino.com
www.cubino.com
Public key availabe in my Web and in RedIris
 
E

Euler

Guest
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 19:22:48 +0200, eric <mleh@tinet.fut.es> wrote:

>London Stagecoach Employee Says Bus Bombing Suspicious
>
>Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet | July 15 2005
>
>We received an e mail from an employee of Stagecoach, the company
>responsible for the majority of London buses.
>



yo me creo mas lo que dijo uno de los que salio del autobus, que
declaro que uno de los suicidas le dijo 1 minuto antes de la
explosion," hoy vamos a morir todos"
Solo esa frase desbarata todas las teorias del email.


Yo só me creo que cualquier fiel a la religión del amor pueda ser un asesino suicida..


http://www.prophetofdoom.net/


salud

z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
zz
z
z
z
zz
z
z
z
zz
z
z
z
zz
z
z
z
z
"Read Euler,read Euler. He is the master of us all." Pierre-Simon Laplace
 
E

eric

Guest
Euler escribió:
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 19:22:48 +0200, eric <mleh@tinet.fut.es> wrote:
>
>
>>London Stagecoach Employee Says Bus Bombing Suspicious
>>
>>Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet | July 15 2005
>>
>>We received an e mail from an employee of Stagecoach, the company
>>responsible for the majority of London buses.
>>

>
>
>
> yo me creo mas lo que dijo uno de los que salio del autobus, que
> declaro que uno de los suicidas le dijo 1 minuto antes de la
> explosion," hoy vamos a morir todos"
> Solo esa frase desbarata todas las teorias del email.


No es una teoria, la camara no funcionaba, mucha casualidad, en el 11-S
no funcionaban(estaban demasiado dañadas) las cajas negras de los aviones.
Otra cosa que nos quieren hacer creer es que uno de los suicidas, era un
hombre que acababa de tener (su mujer) un bebe (de 8 meses) y su mujer
esperaba otro...
Luego lo del explosivo, antes era explosivo militar y ahora se lo habian
montado ellos en la bañera...Y QUE MAS!!!!
 
A

Altair

Guest
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 05:42:40 +0200, eric <mleh@tinet.fut.es> wrote:

>
>
>Euler escribió:
>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 19:22:48 +0200, eric <mleh@tinet.fut.es> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>London Stagecoach Employee Says Bus Bombing Suspicious
>>>
>>>Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet | July 15 2005
>>>
>>>We received an e mail from an employee of Stagecoach, the company
>>>responsible for the majority of London buses.
>>>

>>
>>
>>
>> yo me creo mas lo que dijo uno de los que salio del autobus, que
>> declaro que uno de los suicidas le dijo 1 minuto antes de la
>> explosion," hoy vamos a morir todos"
>> Solo esa frase desbarata todas las teorias del email.

>
>No es una teoria, la camara no funcionaba, mucha casualidad, en el 11-S
>no funcionaban(estaban demasiado dañadas) las cajas negras de los aviones.
>Otra cosa que nos quieren hacer creer es que uno de los suicidas, era un
>hombre que acababa de tener (su mujer) un bebe (de 8 meses) y su mujer
>esperaba otro...
>Luego lo del explosivo, antes era explosivo militar y ahora se lo habian
>montado ellos en la bañera...Y QUE MAS!!!!



Pues que el explosivo puede ser militar y montar las bombas en la
bañera. No veo el problema para ello.
 
E

eric

Guest
Altair escribió:
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 05:42:40 +0200, eric <mleh@tinet.fut.es> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Euler escribió:
>>
>>>On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 19:22:48 +0200, eric <mleh@tinet.fut.es> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>London Stagecoach Employee Says Bus Bombing Suspicious
>>>>
>>>>Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet | July 15 2005
>>>>
>>>>We received an e mail from an employee of Stagecoach, the company
>>>>responsible for the majority of London buses.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>yo me creo mas lo que dijo uno de los que salio del autobus, que
>>>declaro que uno de los suicidas le dijo 1 minuto antes de la
>>>explosion," hoy vamos a morir todos"
>>>Solo esa frase desbarata todas las teorias del email.

>>
>>No es una teoria, la camara no funcionaba, mucha casualidad, en el 11-S
>>no funcionaban(estaban demasiado dañadas) las cajas negras de los aviones.
>>Otra cosa que nos quieren hacer creer es que uno de los suicidas, era un
>>hombre que acababa de tener (su mujer) un bebe (de 8 meses) y su mujer
>>esperaba otro...
>>Luego lo del explosivo, antes era explosivo militar y ahora se lo habian
>>montado ellos en la bañera...Y QUE MAS!!!!

>
>
>
> Pues que el explosivo puede ser militar y montar las bombas en la
> bañera. No veo el problema para ello.

Primero dijeron que el explosivo era militar, logico por los destrozos
causados y el tipo de delagracion, ahora dicen que lo fabricaron (el
explosivo) en la bañera.
Si fue militar....de donde se conseguio? Y si no, resulta practicamente
imposible comprar los ingredientes de las sustancias por hallarse en el
index de sustancias controladas por la policia cientifica (Hay una
unidad que se dedica exclusivamente a esto)
 
E

eric

Guest
Re: Todo esto atufa...y mas...

Prior to his appointment as Commissioner of Transport for London in
January 2001, Robert Kiley served as President and Chief Executive
Officer of the New York City Partnership. The Partnership, the city's
leading business and civic organisation, improves the city's economic
climate through advocacy and public-private initiatives in education,
job creation, affordable housing, and neighbourhood development. Its
membership reflects the impressive breadth of the city's private,
non-profit and civic leadership.

From 1991 to 1994 he was President of Fischbach Corporation, a major
New York-based construction and engineering company, and in 1994 became
its Chairman until assuming his position at the New York City
Partnership in 1995.

From 1983 until 1990, he was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA). At the MTA he was
responsible for five transportation agencies serving the New York
Metropolitan Region where he directed the rebuilding of New York's
public transportation system and restructured its management. He led
successful efforts to obtain more than $16 billion from the New York
State legislature for capital improvements to the city's subways and
buses, commuter railroads, tunnels and bridges in the MTA region.

Robert Kiley has consulted with corporations and public agencies at the
Management Analysis Center (now Cap Gemini) then headquartered in
Cambridge, Massachusetts. In the 1970s he was Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority in
Boston and served as Deputy Mayor of the City of Boston.

Early in his career, he was with the CIA, where he served as Manager of
Intelligence Operations and then as Executive Assistant to the Director.

Robert Kiley is a Member of the Council on Foreign Relations, Board
Member of the Salzburg International Seminar, the American Repertory
Theater, MONY Group Inc, the Princeton Review Inc and Edison Schools,
Inc. He is also on the Advisory Board of the Harvard University Center
for State and Local Government.

A Magna Cum Laude graduate of the University of Notre Dame, Indiana,
USA, Robert Kiley and his wife Rona now live in London.