OFFENCES AGAINST ONE'S SELF [UNPUBLISHED]
Jeremy Bentham

Contents

Offences of impurity--their varietys
Paederasty makes the greatest figure
Whether they produce any primary mischief
As a secondary mischief whether they produce any alarm in the community
Whether any danger
Reasons that have commonly been assigned
Whether against the security of the individual
Whether it debilitates--Montesquieu
What says history?
Whether it enervates the patient more than the agent
What says history?
Whether it hurts population?
Whether it robs women
What says history?
How is it at Otaheite?
If it were more frequent than the regular connection in what sense could it be termed unnatural?
Among the antients--whether it excluded not the regular taste
Reason why it might he expected so to do
The notion that it does has sometimes operated by accident in favor of persons under prosecution
As it excludes not the regular taste, it is liable to disturb marriage
Causes of this taste
Whether, if it robbed women, it ought at all events to be punished?
Inducements for punishing it not justfied on the ground of mischievousness
But on the ground of antipathy
Philosophical pride
Religion
Hatred of pleasure
How far the antipathy is a just ground
If it were, so would heresy
The antipathy itself a punishment
Punishment however not an incentive
Danger of false prosecutions greater in this case than others
Used as an instrument of extortion
Between women
Whether worse between men and women than between men
Bestiality
Burning the animal
Masturbation
Domestic discipline the proper remedy against impurities
Distinction between physical impurity and moral
Antipathy no sufficient warrant
Whether it is an affront to God?
Whether it hurts population--Bermondus
God's burning Sodom--whether a sufficient warrant?
Zeal shewn against it in the English Marine Law
Horror of singularity
Mischief to population reparable by fine
Athenians wanted but permission to marry two wives
How came scratching not to be held abominable?
Punishment not necessary for the sake of women

La prostitución infantil. Si usted mantiene una relación sexual con una joven de trece años y después se va, eso no es ilegal (en España). Pero si usted le paga, está cometiendo un acto ilegal y puede ingresar en la cárcel incluso. La ley no está castigando el hecho en si, sino las relaciones mutuas y consentidas del comercio: “[…] En la misma pena incurrirá el que se lucre explotando la prostitución de otra persona, aun con el consentimiento de la misma”[2]. Si usted compra una fotografía de un menor de edad que se pueda considerar pornográfica, también será castigado por la ley. Probablemente la prostituta infantil no quiera serlo, pero a nadie le gusta trabajar. Nosotros trabajamos para vivir mejor y satisfacer a la comunidad lucrándonos por ello. La prostituta menor de edad, suele trabajar, no para vivir mejor, sino para sobrevivir en la mayoría de casos. Al prohibirle su libre elección a trabajar y obligarla a estudiar, le estamos negando una fuente de financiación fundamental para ella y su familia. La prostituta infantil suele estar en países pobres donde apenas tiene alternativas. Su trabajo le permite sobrevivir, y no vivir mejor.

Iniciado por Da Grappla

Según mi novia sí, pero me los tiro de los de sin olor.

Iniciado por gabrielo

segun el codigo penal español tener sexo con alguien mayor de 13 años con las facultades mentales normales, no es delito siempre que no haya entre medio dinero

Victims of clerical sex abuse have reacted furiously to Pope Benedict's claim yesterday that paedophilia wasn't considered an “absolute evil” as recently as the 1970s.

l