Bueno, esta eso de que es muy extraño de que de la nada salga algo, que la probabilidad de que se den las condiciones para que estemos aqui es infima y que una estructura compleja sea creada simplemente por el azar es imposible pero son solo chorradas, no vayamos a salirnos de la senda del correcto pensar.

Lo malo de la teoria de la evolucion es que es dificilmente falsable y segun Popper esta es una condicion necesaria para que aporte informacion y sea considerado ciencia pero vamos, que a mi me parece todo guay del paraguay.

__________________

1. If it were true, you would expect to find the earliest horse fossils in the lowest rock strata. But you don't. In fact, bones of the supposed 'earliest' horses have been found at or near the surface. Sometimes they are found right next to modern horse fossils! O. C. Marsh commented on living horses with multiple toes, and said there were cases in the American Southwest where 'both fore and hind feet may each have two extra digits fairly developed, and all of nearly equal size, thus corresponding to the feet of the extinct Protohippus'.1 In National Geographic (January 1981, p. 74), there is a picture of the foot of a so-called early horse, Pliohippus, and one of the modern Equus that were found at the same volcanic site in Nebraska. The writer says: 'Dozens of hoofed species lived on the American plains.' Doesn't this suggest two different species, rather than the evolutionary progression of one?

2. There is no one site in the world where the evolutionary succession of the horse can be seen. Rather, the fossil fragments have been gathered from several continents on the assumption of evolutionary progress, and then used to support the assumption. This is circular reasoning, and does not qualify as objective science.

3. The theory of horse evolution has very serious genetic problems to overcome. How do we explain the variations in the numbers of ribs and lumbar vertebrae within the imagined evolutionary progression? For example, the number of ribs in the supposedly 'intermediate' stages of the horse varies from 15 to 19 and then finally settles at 18. The number of lumbar vertebrae also allegedly swings from six to eight and then returns to six again.

4. Finally, when evolutionists assume that the horse has grown progressively in size over millions of years, what they forget is that modern horses vary enormously in size. The largest horse today is the Clydesdale; the smallest is the Fallabella, which stands at 43 centimetres (17 inches) tall. Both are members of the same species, and neither has evolved from the other.


Fuente: What’s happened to the horse?

Ron Paul acepta la teoría de la evolución

Pero cree que hay dudas sobre el proceso orignal de creación de la vida. (a partir de la mitad)

__________________

Hombre, si escuchas en 5:07 dice que no hay pruebas, no hay fósiles de transición, etc...

"I have no idea, there's no proof, nobody shows the actual body skeleton or the genetics or a transition from a more primitive primate to the human being"

Sí, está exponiendo sus dudas sobre que todo sea evolución, y si tiras más adelante dice que los animales cambian, y que la evolución juega un papel en eso.

Son las maniobras religiosas para encajar la evolución con la creencia de Dios. Mientras le sirva, no soy un experto en evolución, pero nunca podré entender el fenomeno religión.

__________________