 |
| | |
|
 Tweet |
| | Herramientas | Desplegado |
07-ene-2009, 13:13
| ||||
| ||||
| Pues acaba de leerlo y después mira esta noticia, a ver si te cuadra: Kissinger: Obama primed to create 'New World Order' Policy guru says global upheaval presents 'great opportunity' According to Henry Kissinger, the Nobel Peace Prize winner and former secretary of state under President Nixon, conflicts across the globe and an international respect for Barack Obama have created the perfect setting for establishment of "a New World Order." Kissinger has long been an integral figure in U.S. foreign policy, holding positions in the Nixon, Ford and Reagan administrations. Author of over a dozen books on foreign policy, Kissinger was also named by President Bush as the chairman of the Sept. 11 investigatory commission. Kissinger made the remark in an interview with CNBC's "Squawk on the Street" hosts Mark Haines and Erin Burnett at the New York Stock Exchange, after Burnett asked him what international conflict would define the Obama administration's foreign policy. Read "Hope of the Wicked," where author Ted Flynn reveals the greatest deception in modern history – corporations, foundations and governments converging to bring about a New World Order. "The president-elect is coming into office at a moment when there is upheaval in many parts of the world simultaneously," Kissinger responded. "You have India, Pakistan; you have the jihadist movement. So he can't really say there is one problem, that it's the most important one. But he can give new impetus to American foreign policy partly because the reception of him is so extraordinary around the world. His task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a new world order can be created. It's a great opportunity, it isn't just a crisis." (...) The phrase 'new world order' traces back at least as far as 1940, when author H.G. Wells used it as the title of a book about a socialist, unified, one-world government. The phrase has also been linked to American presidents, including Woodrow Wilson, whose work on establishing the League of Nations pioneered the concept of international government bodies, and to the first President Bush, who used the phrase in a 1989 speech. "A new partnership of nations has begun, and we stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment," said Bush before a joint session of Congress. "Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective – a new world order – can emerge: A new era … in which the nations of the world, east and west, north and south, can prosper and live in harmony." The phrase "New World Order" causes alarm for many Americans, particularly those concerned about an international governing body trumping U.S. sovereignty or those that interpret biblical prophecy to foretell the establishment of a one-world government as key to the rise of the Antichrist. Conspiracy theorists, too, have latched on to the phrase, concerned that powerful financial or government figures are secretly plotting to rule the world. Kissinger's ties to government and international powers – as well as his use of the phrase – have made him suspect in the eyes of many who are wary of what "new world order" might actually mean. "There is a need for a new world order," Kissinger told PBS interviewer Charlie Rose last year, "I think that at the end of this administration, with all its turmoil, and at the beginning of the next, we might actually witness the creation of a new order – because people looking in the abyss, even in the Islamic world, have to conclude that at some point, ordered expectations must return under a different system." As WND reported earlier, Kissinger was also part of last year's super-secret Bilderberg Group, an organization of powerful international elites, including government, business, academic and journalistic representatives, that has convened annually since 1954. According to sources that have penetrated the high-security meetings in the past, the Bilderberg meetings emphasize a globalist agenda and promote the idea that the notion of national sovereignty is antiquated and regressive. CNBC's Haines concluded the Kissinger interview by asking, "Are you confident about the people President-elect Obama has chosen to surround him?" Kissinger replied, "He has appointed an extraordinarily able group of people in both the international and financial fields." Kissinger: Obama primed to create 'New World Order' Última edición por SNB4President; 07-ene-2009 a las 13:15  |
| Estos 2 usuarios dan las gracias a SNB4President por su mensaje: | ||
|
07-ene-2009, 14:41
| ||||
| ||||
|
Iniciado por luisfernando  por favor,el NWO esta planificado desde hace 50 años,por el club bilderberg,su objetivo: un solo banco mundial para todos,una sola moneda para todos,ect ect igual que el señor de los anillos pero a lo psicopata  muy bueno
__________________ Madmaxista moderado. |
|
07-ene-2009, 14:45
| ||||
| ||||
|
Iniciado por cuchilla Son las corporaciones las que estan encaminandose a la direccion global del planeta, recordad que las mayores corporaciones del planeta y sus subsidiarias estan en manos de un pequeño grupo de personas (Bildeberg) y que desde hace mas de 100 años se mueven los hilos para obstentar el poder absoluto por su parte (Esto no es ciencia ficcion ni las elocubraciones de un descerebrado ¡¡) JFK, Heisenhowar por poner algun ejemplo nos dieron ya el aviso, pero fijaros que ya muy anteriormente algunos presidentes de los EE.UU tambien previnieron que esta situacion podria llegar a darse y los peligros que ello supondria. Pues a la mierda ya!! Que empiecen a tirar bombas ya copon, pero que dejen de tenernos en vilo con la puta crisis. Que esto es un sinvivir. Pero que empiecen a tirar las bombas por Oriente Medio, Africa y Asia y America y Oceania, vaya que luego de tirarlas se den cuenta de que estaban equivocados.
__________________ Madmaxista moderado. |
|
07-ene-2009, 17:18
| ||||
| ||||
|
Iniciado por SNB4President Pues acaba de leerlo y después mira esta noticia, a ver si te cuadra: min. 2:45 Inhabitat China Announces the World’s Largest Solar Plant China anuncia que va a construir la planta de energía solar más grande del mundo The Great Dragon Awakens: China Challenges American Hegemony China desafía la hegemonía de EEUU FT.com / China / Economy & Trade - China central bank sees GDP up 8% China central bank sees GDP up 8% Middle East Online "The Bush administration's Global War on Terror and its subsidiary wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have, in effect, been a giant Ponzi scheme. At a cost of nearly one trillion taxpayer dollars to date, Bush's mad 'global war' simply sucked needed money out of our world at levels that made Bernie Madoff seem like a small fry, says Tom Engelhardt"
__________________ “Llegará el día en que desapareciendo las sombras sólo queden las verdades, que no dejarán de conocerse por más que quieran ocultarse entre el torrente oscuro de las injusticias” (Juan Manuel de Rosas. 1857) |
|
09-ene-2009, 15:54
| ||||
| ||||
| Sarkozy, Merkel, Blair call for new capitalism - Yahoo! News Sarkozy, Merkel, Blair call for new capitalism Digitizing Medical Records Could Be Daunting Task - Money News Story - WLWT Cincinnati Obama hace un llamamiento a la computarización completa de registros médicos Barack Obama's 'Black Widow' : The Super Spy Computer | Pakistan Daily "Viuda negra": El super ordenador espía de Obama que procesa millones de llamadas telefónicas y mensajes de correo por minuto en varios idiomas Martial Law, the Financial Bailout, and War Ley marcial, rescates financieros y guerra
__________________ “Llegará el día en que desapareciendo las sombras sólo queden las verdades, que no dejarán de conocerse por más que quieran ocultarse entre el torrente oscuro de las injusticias” (Juan Manuel de Rosas. 1857) Última edición por saquetas de Goldman; 09-ene-2009 a las 18:53 |
| Estos 3 usuarios dan las gracias a saquetas de Goldman por su mensaje: | ||
|
10-ene-2009, 00:37
| ||||
| ||||
|
Iniciado por Runaway Hombre, otro que se ha leído el libro del Club Bildemberg, de Daniel Estulin ... Yo también he empezado a leer ese libro hace poco, parece que está de moda. Personamente, por lo poco que he leído, me parece que tiene una calidad periodística bastante pobre, además de que es un poco tostón. Yo soy bastante escéptico en cuanto a los temas conspiranoicos sobre el club Bilderberg y similares, sin embargo tengo que reconocer que estoy de acuerdo con que sobran unos 4000 millones de personas en el mundo, y lo llevo meditando desde muchos años antes de conocer la existencia de éste club y de otras teorías de ese estilo. Creo que hay que darse cuenta de que nunca ha habido una población tan grande, y los sistemas económicos y sociales que conocemos simplemente no están diseñados ni preparados para gestionar esta situación. |
|
13-ene-2009, 14:16
| ||||
| ||||
| From The Times January 13, 2009 Let's face it, soon Big Brother will have no trouble recognising you. Increasing use of face-recognition technology should worry us. David Rowan No social justice issue mobilises columnists more unflinchingly than their right to a prominent, contractually guaranteed byline photograph. Not me. Unlike fellow commentators whose idealised physiognomic representations remain deferentially untouched by comment editors for decades at a time, I abhor the mugshot perching smirkingly above this paragraph. Not a question of false modesty, you understand: more a desperate attempt to undermine the privacy-sapping consequences that face-recognition technologies are about to wreak on our lives. This is the year when automated face-recognition finally goes mainstream, and it's about time we considered its social and political implications. Over the past few days, at trade fairs from Las Vegas to Seoul, a constant theme has been the unstoppable advance of “FRT”, the benign abbreviation favoured by industry insiders. We learnt that Apple's iPhoto update will automatically scan your photos to detect people's faces and group them accordingly, and that Lenovo's new PC will log on users by monitoring their facial patterns. Soon you will expect your mobile-phone camera to recognise your friends and photograph them only when a smile is detected, and to pass through airport security bearing not a ticket but your standard grin. There will be plenty of life-enhancing applications of these technologies, which use feature-extraction algorithms to find patterns in skin texture and in the curves of the eye sockets, chin and nose. It could be fun to upload a photo to a website such as myheritage.com to see which celebrity you most resemble mathematically. More revolutionary still is the way shopping could be changed: malls could target consumers with special offers using digital display panels, such as NEC's Eye Flavour system, whose face-recognition camera determines a customer's age and gender so that “the most effective content” is displayed before it monitors their emotional reactions. Background Face recognition robot tests at immigration ID cards are the ultimate identity theft Is biometrics the answer? Image morphing to give suspects recognisable face Naturally, some applications will be harder to sell publicly: some newspapers have already expressed outrage that St Neots Community College, in Cambridgeshire, is this week starting to scan pupils' faces to monitor latecomers. But overall - amid intense public debate about terror threats, street crime and “uncontrolled” immigration - the face-recognition camera is being sold hard as the solution to countless social problems. Too bad it risks ruining the lives of those innocently caught up. Rob Milliron, a construction worker, had a close escape back in June 2001, when, while eating lunch in Tampa, Florida, he was photographed without his knowledge by a hidden government facial-recognition surveillance camera scouring for felons and sex-offenders. Police passed images to the press and, although Mr Milliron wasn't a match to a bad guy, his picture was printed in a magazine alongside the words: “You can't hide those lying eyes in Tampa.” A woman in Tulsa called police to identify him falsely as her ex-husband wanted on felony child-neglect charges. When police surrounded Mr Milliron days later at his construction site, he had to point out that, yes, that was him in the photograph, but no, he had never married, never had children, and never been to Oklahoma. As he told the local newspaper: “They made me feel like a criminal.” Tampa scrapped its facial-recognition system two years later, citing its ineffectiveness, but not before Milliron had become something of a poster-boy for the technology's unreliability and its likelihood to trap the innocent amid its many “false positives”. Since then, the War on Terror has amplified official interest in and financing for face-recognition trials as a means of identifying the supposedly high-risk - but, in projects from Newham in East London to Logan Airport in Boston, results have been flawed to say the least. In one high-profile trial, at Palm Beach International Airport, a facial-recognition system at a security checkpoint matched faces to those in its database just 47 per cent of the time. Ordinary passengers and other airport staff not meant to be recognised, meanwhile, triggered 1,081 false alarms in a month, risking interrogation or detention. Yet just because, for the moment, such surveillance systems are flawed - their recognition befuddled by human ageing, outdoor light, poor image resolution, even facial hair - the extraordinary pace of development means that far more accurate screening systems are imminent. Researchers are developing sharply accurate scanners that monitor faces in 3D and software that analyses skin texture to turn tiny wrinkles, blemishes and spots into a numerical formula. The strongest face-recognition algorithms are now considered more accurate than most humans - and already the Home Office and the Association of Chief Police Officers have held discussions about the possibility of linking such systems with automatic car-numberplate recognition and public-transport databases. Join everything together via the internet, and voilà - the nation's population, down to the individual Times reader, can be conveniently and automatically monitored in real time. Just listen to senior law-enforcement executives to understand their brave new intentions. Three months ago, Mark Branchflower, Interpol's database chief, declared facial recognition a desirable means of alerting local forces about the movements of internationally wanted suspects, “a step we could go to quite quickly”. And in evidence to MPs last March, Peter Neyroud, head of the National Policing Improvement Agency, raised the prospect of “automated face recognition” to identify suspects, as well as “behaviourial matching” software that uses CCTV images to predict potential troublemakers. So let's understand this: governments and police are planning to implement increasingly accurate surveillance technologies that are unnoticeable, cheap, pervasive, ubiquitous, and searchable in real time. And private businesses, from bars to workplaces, will also operate such systems, whose data trail may well be sold on or leaked to third parties - let's say, insurance companies that have an interest in knowing about your unhealthy lifestyle, or your ex-spouse who wants evidence that you can afford higher maintenance payments. Rather than jump up and down with rage - you never know who is watching through the window - you have a duty now, as a citizen, to question this stealthy rush towards permanent individual surveillance. A Government already obsessed with pursuing an unworkable and unnecessary identity-card database must be held to account. As for me, I've been re-watching for inspiration the 1997 film Face/Off, in which John Travolta wears Nicolas Cage's face as a way of infiltrating Cage's criminal gang. And if that fails to inspire a means of fighting back, face-transplant surgery is always an option. David Rowan is editor of the UK edition of Wired magazine, which launches in April Let's face it, soon Big Brother will have no trouble recognising you | David Rowan - Times Online Pues eso, que va tomando color. |
|
14-ene-2009, 09:20
| ||||
| ||||
| Mexico's leader says he'd consider NAFTA changes MEXICO CITY — Mexican President Felipe Calderon said Tuesday in Washington that his government was open to reviewing the environmental and labor provisions of the 15-year-old North American Free Trade Agreement. “We have always been willing to revise aspects” of the treaty, Calderon told President George W. Bush during a White House meeting. President-elect Barack Obama said after a Monday meeting with Calderon that he wanted to “upgrade” the accord, popularly known as NAFTA. During last year’s Democratic presidential primaries, Obama threatened to scuttle the treaty if he could not win environmental and labor concessions from Mexico and Canada. “We should use the hammer of opt-out as leverage to ensure that we actually get environmental and labor standards that are enforced,” Obama said during one campaign debate last February. But some American trade experts see Obama’s comments this week as far from threatening to trash the agreement. They point to Obama’s appointment of former Dallas Mayor Ron Kirk, a NAFTA advocate, as U.S. trade representative as an indication of the incoming president’s intentions. “The idea of throwing these relations into turmoil is not what the Obama administration wants,” said Shannon O’Neil, a Mexico analyst at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York. But “NAFTA was forged 15 years ago, and lots of new issues have come up.” Jeffrey Schott of the Institute of International Economics, a pro-free-trade think tank in Washington, agreed. “NAFTA,” he said, “needs to be upgraded to meet the new challenges all three countries are facing.” Schott wrote the Obama transition team that the treaty needs to take account of greater need for U.S. border security and put more teeth into the agreement’s environmental and labor provisions. Labor and environmental issues were shunted into “side agreements” to win the treaty’s approval in the U.S. Congress. As many as 1 million American jobs have been lost to Mexico since the treaty began in 1994, hitting Midwest manufacturing communities particularly hard. Similarly, Mexico has lost 250,000 manufacturing jobs in the same period. But under NAFTA, trade among the U.S., Mexico and Canada has grown from $293 billion to nearly $1 trillion annually. Canada is the U.S.’ top-ranking trade partner, and Mexico is its third, after China. Mexico ships 80 percent of its exports to the U.S. and buys half its imports from Americans. Calderon has in the past expressed hopes that re-jiggering NAFTA would include provisions for expanding the number of Mexicans to legally work in the U.S. But he told reporters Tuesday that he did not intend to push for U.S. immigration reform in exchange for agreeing to consider changes to NAFTA. Mexico's leader says he'd consider NAFTA changes | Business | Chron.com - Houston Chronicle
__________________ Cuando al fin encontramos las respuestas, cambiaron las preguntas. |
|
14-ene-2009, 09:38
| ||||
| ||||
|
Iniciado por Hipo, the Caos Yo también he empezado a leer ese libro hace poco, parece que está de moda. Personamente, por lo poco que he leído, me parece que tiene una calidad periodística bastante pobre, además de que es un poco tostón. Yo soy bastante escéptico en cuanto a los temas conspiranoicos sobre el club Bilderberg y similares, sin embargo tengo que reconocer que estoy de acuerdo con que sobran unos 4000 millones de personas en el mundo, y lo llevo meditando desde muchos años antes de conocer la existencia de éste club y de otras teorías de ese estilo. Aquí los únicos que sobran son los que parasitan al 99% de la población y en su mayoría los mantienen sojuzgados. Esos sí que sobran: sionistas, vaticano, neocons, banca mundial... Estás adoptando la idea que nos quieren implantar. La idea sobre que sobran muchos piojosos que ensucian "su" mundo. Nos la quieren meter a fuego para luego justificar medidas en contra de a población en aras de u mejor medio ambiente.
__________________ Lo esencial es invisible a los ojos- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry |
| Estos usuarios dan las gracias a rory por su mensaje: | ||
|
15-ene-2009, 00:19
| ||||
| ||||
|
Iniciado por rory Aquí los únicos que sobran son los que parasitan al 99% de la población y en su mayoría los mantienen sojuzgados. Esos sí que sobran: sionistas, vaticano, neocons, banca mundial... En ningún momento he pretendido molestar a nadie con mi comentario. Estoy de acuerdo en que hay muchos parásitos que se aprovechan de la mayoría de la población más desfavorecida, y no creo que se pueda justificar ninguna medida para reducir la población en forma de esterilizaciones masivas, genocidios, provocando hambrunas, etc... Lo que he querido decir es que en mi opinión es simplemente una cuestión matemática: si el planeta puede producir recursos para mantener holgadamente a "x" personas y la población es mayor, es que hay demasiada gente o hay que buscar alternativas para obtener más recursos y que lleguen a toda la población. Desde luego es muy discutible que el mundo no tenga recursos para mantener a 6700 millones de humanos,así como la cifra exacta que podría mantener en caso negativo, y, obviamente, que es necesario buscar alternativas y que lleguen a la mayor población posible está fuera de toda duda. Esto es sólo una opinión personal, sin pretender hacer campaña sobre ella, si no más bien para saber si alguien puede aportar datos a favor o en contra. Si alguien conoce alguna estimación fiable sobre la población soportable por la Tierra me encantaría que pusiera algún link. |
|
« Tema Anterior
|
Próximo Tema »
| Herramientas | |
| Desplegado | |
Mode Lineal
| |
La franja horaria es GMT +1. Ahora son las 15:57.