Hola a todos. Compre un piso en Arroyomolinos por 50 millones como inversion y puse 8 millones de pesetas la gran pega es que ahora me entregan las llaves y tengo que pagar una letra de 1500 euros que no puedo afrontar por mis gastos personales y yo no contaba con ello. Hay una clausula en el contrato con la inmobiliaria que dice que si no puedo afrontarlo ,de los 8 millones que puse pierdo un 50 % y estoy muy nervioso porque quiero vender el piso. Que debo de hacer por favor , si puedo arreglarlo de alguna manera. Este piso tiene garaje, piscina y esta al lado de el centro comercial Xanadu. Gracias por su ayuda. AYUDA

oh oh me quedao sin palabras

Pues perder el 50%, como indica el contrato.

__________________

Pareces un troll. Te van a dar bastante caña, y no es para menos, dado el foro en el que estás y al que has venido admitiendo especular con la vivienda.

Puedes dar por perdidos esos 4 millones, y eso si no son 8 (porque la inmobiliaria no te los devuelva, en cuyo caso tendrías que ir a juicio para intentar recuperarlos...).

Pase, pase, ha llegado usted al sitio adecuado...

Unas veces se gana y otras se pierde, vete mentalizandote.

Tan solo es dinero.

Un saludo.

__________________

Cosas absurdas: Controles anti-dopaje en el Ajedrez
Del 1 al 15 de diciembre se celebrarán en Doha (Qatar) los Juegos Asiáticos en los cuales debutará el Ajedrez como paso previo para alcanzar la condición de deporte olímpico.

Pero ese proceso conlleva otro curioso requisito: para poder convertirse en deporte olimpico el ajedrez debe contar con controles anti-dopaje.

En el mundo ajedrecístico no salen de su asombro y se preguntan que sustancia puede hacer que un jugador mejore su juego. Nosotros también nos lo preguntamos.

Pero la burocracia manda y los jugadores de ajedrez en estos Juegos Asiáticos no tendrán mas opción que pasar el control de dopaje después de las partidas.

¿Qué será lo próximo? Si juega usted al dominó la partidita habitual con los amigos en el bar, prepárese, puede ser el siguiente.

Second votes could sway Iowa Democratic race

By John Whitesides, Political Correspondent

ANKENY, Iowa (Reuters) - In Iowa's unpredictable Democratic presidential scramble, a voter's second choice can be as important as the first -- and ultimately could make the difference in a tight race.

Under the arcane rules in Iowa's January 3 contest, which opens the state-by-state race to choose candidates for the November 2008 election, Democratic contenders are required to muster support from at least 15 percent of the attendees in each precinct to be considered viable.

If a candidate cannot reach that threshold, his backers can switch to a second choice. This is a potential boost for leading contenders Barack Obama, John Edwards and Hillary Clinton, whose campaigns have worked hard to identify and court supporters of second-tier contenders.


In many precincts, supporters of candidates like New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich or Sens. Joseph Biden of Delaware and Chris Dodd of Connecticut could find themselves free agents looking for someone else to back.

The phenomenon could be another hurdle for Clinton in Iowa, as polls show Edwards, the former senator from North Carolina, and Obama, a first-term Illinois senator, gain slightly more second-choice voters.

"The question of viability and second choices is a huge wild card, particularly in a very close race," said Gordon Fischer, former chairman of the Iowa Democratic Party and an Obama supporter.

"There is no question it can make a difference," he said. "And there is no question nobody really knows what will happen."

Iowa kicks off the state-by-state battle to pick nominees for the November 2008 election and most candidates put enormous effort into making a strong showing in the Midwestern state.

The rules of the Republican contest in Iowa, which takes place on the same day, do not allow for second-choice votes.

DEMOCRATIC KINGMAKERS

The second-choice rules could make kingmakers of Democratic voters like Gary and Carol Keast, both 71, a retired couple from the state capital Des Moines who support Biden because they like his foreign policy experience.


But they plan to go their separate ways if Biden's support does not reach 15 percent in their precinct. He will go with Obama. She is a Clinton fan.

"I think she has the best chance to win (the presidency), and I want a Democrat to win," Carol Keast said of Clinton, a New York senator and former first lady.

Gary Keast said he liked Obama's early opposition to the Iraq war when he was an Illinois state senator. "The fact that he wasn't part of the war is a big plus," he said.

Polls show that among supporters of Richardson, Biden, Dodd, and Kucinich -- the candidates most likely to fail to meet the threshold in a given precinct -- Edwards was the second choice of 29 percent, Obama 24 percent and Clinton 15 percent in a recent Rasmussen poll.

"We've been through the second-choice stuff before and we feel Senator Edwards is well placed to be successful there," said Jennifer O'Malley Dixon, Iowa state director for Edwards, who was second in Iowa when he sought the nomination in 2004.

Clinton's problem with second-choice voters could be she is too well-known and perceptions of her are set, Fischer said.

"What more information can anyone possibly want or need about her? If you aren't already for her, you've made a conscious decision not to be for her," he said.

But Clinton's experience and her strong support among women could give her a boost among second-choice voters, who often give the race a late reevaluation, Clinton aides say.


Predicting the impact of the second-place voting is mostly guesswork. It is hard to track what happens in each of the more than 1,700 precincts around the state, analysts say.

"There is not a lot of good data on people making second choices and how it has worked. It's all anecdotal," said David Redlawsk, a political scientist at the University of Iowa and director of the Iowa poll.

(To read more about the U.S. political campaign, visit Reuters "Tales from the Trail: 2008" online at http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/)

(Editing by David Storey)

Con las "inversiones" se gana o se pierde. A usted le ha tocado perder. Lea bien el contrato, le garantizan la plusvalia?

__________________

A mí también me mola vivir por encima de mis posibilidades, pero la diferencia es que lo suelo hacer durante apenas un par de días al año, yéndome un finde a algún lado y alojándome en un hotel de 4 estrellas. Lo que no hago es comprarme pisos de 50 millones.....

¿Pensabas ganar mucho más de los 4 millones que seguro vas a perder, no?

Pues asume que has tenido mala suerte, igual que si hubieras invertido en bolsa, o creado una empresa que no ha funcionado. Ánimo, que 4 millones no es 'mucho dinero', y la próxima vez más suerte.

Saludos