Ver Mensaje Individual
  #51 (permalink)  
Antiguo 08-jul-2009, 15:36
Avatar de hugolp
hugolp hugolp está desconectado
Excelentísimo, ilustrísimo, magnífico y grandísimo señor de élite de los gurús burbujistas
 
Fecha de Ingreso: 22-enero-2009
Ubicación: Barcelona
Mensajes: 11.765
Gracias: 5.555
9.812 Agradecimientos de 4.061 mensajes
Ignorar usuario para siempre
Iniciado por Mr. Batty Ver Mensaje
After Senator DeMint brought Audit the Fed to the floor, Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska raised a "point of order" to prevent a vote, claiming that the amendment violated Senate Rule 16 by "legislating" on an appropriations bill. The Senate president agreed, and the amendment was shot down.

Senator DeMint did not back down, though, and directly challenged Senate leadership by pointing out the other GAO audits contained in the bill. As Senator DeMint listed them off, the Senate president was forced to agree with Senator DeMint that each one he described, all of which would be left in for final passage, also violated Senate Rule 16.

Which tells us at least one thing: the problem wasn't with "legislating" on the bill or violating Senate Rules (which is commonly done). Shooting down the amendment was about preventing a thorough audit of the Federal Reserve for the first time in its history!

Se van quitando las máscaras. Prohibieron el añadido de auditar la Fed basandose en la "regla 16", pero admitieron todo el resto cuando tb violaban la "regla 16". Van a hacer todo lo que puedan para evitar que pase la legislación, pero esto solo acaba de empezar.
__________________



Responder Citando