
28-may-2009, 09:53
|
 | Super Mario | | Fecha de Ingreso: 22-agosto-2008 Ubicación: Torres gemelas 10-S
Mensajes: 1.977
Gracias: 1.134
1.329 Agradecimientos de 518 mensajes
Ignorar usuario para siempre | |
I do want to address one other subject and it has to do with transparency. You said you have made a commitment to transparency and openness, which is very good and there is a lot of us that want that. And I have dealt with that and have a legislation, HR 1207, dealing with that. But in a real sense, I know what you’re doing here, but the code really protects you from telling us some of the things we’d like to know. For instance, in 1978 when the GAO was given the authority to audit the Fed, it put the exclusion in there that you can’t ask these questions. Precisely, if I wanted to know about all your agreements and discussions with foreign central banks, with foreign governments, with international financial organizations, you have no obligation and you haven’t volunteered to do this. So is there a way that you would, since you’re moving in this direction, move and consider supporting a position where Congress has a right to know these very, very crucial, vital issues dealing with their money? y todavía hay "ilusos" que piensan que la FED esta controlada por el gobierno, me estoy acordando de un pagafantas que defendía lo contrario en el hilo de SNB
__________________ Eliminación de las CCAA ya , imposición de la pena de muerte y ajusticiamiento público de los politicuchos que han perpetrado el expolio. |